Havana Still Has That Distinction
Yet, the Miami-Havana debate is ongoing
Yet, the Miami-Havana debate is ongoing
The above photo is courtesy of the El Salvador Foreign Ministry. It shows the first of the more than 8,000 Cubans, blocked at the Costa Rican-Nicaraguan border since November, on an airplane yesterday -- Wednesday, January 13th. They were flown over Nicaragua so they could continue on their way to the Mexico-Texas border. Thanks to a U. S. law known as Wet Foot/Dry Foot, included in the 1966 Cuba Adjustment Act, any Cuban that touches U. S. soil instantly has legal residence and economic welfare. It applies only to Cubans and is one of many U. S. laws -- such as the embargo that dates back to 1962 -- designed to hurt Cuba and provide special privileges and incentives to entice Cubans to defect to the U. S. All other nations strongly resent the discriminatory favoritism accorded only to Cubans. When Nicaragua stopped the land route from Cuba to Texas back in November, the chaos caused acute regional problems.
The El Salvadorean government Wednesday released this photo showing Cubans being processed on their way to the Mexico-Texas border. Since 1966 all Caribbean and Latin American nations have resented the Wet Foot/Dry Foot U. S. policy that grossly favors Cubans and discriminates against all non-Cubans.
The above map shows two favored routes human traffickers have devised to get Cubans to the Texas border: {1} Cuba to Guyana by airplane and then by land to Venezuela and then up through Central America to Mexico; and {2} Cuba to Ecuador by airplane and then by land to Colombia to Panama and on up through Central America to Mexico. In November Nicaragua began blocking these tedious land routes.
This Marco Ruiz/Miami Herald graphic back in November explained how thousands of Cubans got stuck two months ago when Nicaragua stopped their Cuba-to-Texas-to-Miami journey. Only this week have airplane flights, after tedious discussions among a host of involved countries, tried to alleviate this aspect of the ongoing Wet Foot/Dry Foot problem that was legalized by the U. S. Congress in 1966 as one of many laws designed to hurt Cuba by giving very special incentives for Cubans to defect to the United States.
Tomas Regalado was born 68 years ago in Havana. Since 2009 he has been the Mayor of Miami. He told Aljazeera America Wednesday {January 13th} that Miami, already crowded if not overwhelmed with Cuban exiles, might not be ready to handle the latest influx from the Mexican border. Mayor Regalado said, "We don't need people living on the streets for weeks." Miami is not Florida's capital city; that honor is held by Tallahassee, which is far to the northeast. But Miami is Florida's most dominant city and also, in essence, the capital city for millions of Cuban exiles, making Miami truly an extension of old Havana.
While Tomas Regalado, born in Havana 68 years ago, is the Mayor of Miami, Carlos Gimenez {above} has been the Mayor of Miami-Dade County since 2011. Mr. Gimenez was born in Havana 61 years ago. So there is not much difference between old Havana in Cuba and modern Miami in nearby South Florida.
The Fanjul sugar monopoly reigned in Cuba from the 1920s until 1959. After the Cuban Revolution defeated the Batista dictatorship in January of 1959, in short order the Fanjul family -- now led by the brothers Alfonso and Jose Fanjul {above} -- took over the sugar monopoly in South Florida, the Dominican Republic, and the United States!! These ultra-rich brothers exemplify the basic fact that, despite a half-century of hostility, there is not a lot of difference between Havana, the capital of Cuba, and Miami.
Not too long ago, Jim DeFede was a top columnist and the best investigative reporter at the Miami Herald. Then, fully knowing he was risking his high-profile job, Jim wrote a scathing article excoriating Miami's representatives -- namely Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and the Diaz-Balart brothers -- for what Jim considered their unconscionable support of Miami's most famed anti-Cuban Cuban-American terrorists. In the article, Jim pointed out that terrorism against innocent Cubans is/was the same as terrorism against Britons, Americans, etc. {Needless to say, Jim was soon an ex-Miami Herald columnist and investigator reporter, but he now works for the CBS television station in Miami}.
Today Michael Putney is a high-profile, Miami-based television reporter and columnist. And he regularly writes Op-Ed editorial columns for the Miami Herald. He's angry President Obama might visit Cuba. Recently Mr. Putney's column was entitled: "THIS IS NOT THE TIME TO GO TO CUBA, MR. PRESIDENT." A sub-title stated: "Planned Trip To Cuba In March Would Make Obama Look Weak." Because I am a democracy-lover, I believe that in the United States of America, even in Miami, both sides of two-sides stories should see the light of day. Therefore, I believe the Miami Herald should be able to embrace the views of, say, a fired Jim DeFede as well as, say, a Michael Putney. But sadly, I do not believe that Miami is capable of such fairness although polls clearly reveal that most Miami citizens, even in Little Havana, favor Obama's rapprochement with Cuba as opposed to the hostility espoused by Mr. Putney and all four of Miami's members of the U. S Congress -- Ros-Lehtinen, Rubio, Diaz-Balart, and Curbelo.