14.1.16

Miami Is NOT Cuba's Capital

Havana Still Has That Distinction
Yet, the Miami-Havana debate is ongoing 
        The above photo is courtesy of the El Salvador Foreign Ministry. It shows the first of the more than 8,000 Cubans, blocked at the Costa Rican-Nicaraguan border since November, on an airplane yesterday -- Wednesday, January 13th. They were flown over Nicaragua so they could continue on their way to the Mexico-Texas border. Thanks to a U. S. law known as Wet Foot/Dry Foot, included in the 1966 Cuba Adjustment Act, any Cuban that touches U. S. soil instantly has legal residence and economic welfare. It applies only to Cubans and is one of many U. S. laws -- such as the embargo that dates back to 1962 -- designed to hurt Cuba and provide special privileges and incentives to entice Cubans to defect to the U. S. All other nations strongly resent the discriminatory favoritism accorded only to Cubans. When Nicaragua stopped the land route from Cuba to Texas back in November, the chaos caused acute regional problems.
       The El Salvadorean government Wednesday released this photo showing Cubans being processed on their way to the Mexico-Texas border. Since 1966 all Caribbean and Latin American nations have resented the Wet Foot/Dry Foot U. S. policy that grossly favors Cubans and discriminates against all non-Cubans.
            The above map shows two favored routes human traffickers have devised to get Cubans to the Texas border: {1} Cuba to Guyana by airplane and then by land to Venezuela and then up through Central America to Mexico; and {2} Cuba to Ecuador by airplane and then by land to Colombia to Panama and on up through Central America to Mexico. In November Nicaragua began blocking these tedious land routes.
         This Marco Ruiz/Miami Herald graphic back in November explained how thousands of Cubans got stuck two months ago when Nicaragua stopped their Cuba-to-Texas-to-Miami journey. Only this week have airplane flights, after tedious discussions among a host of involved countries, tried to alleviate this aspect of the ongoing Wet Foot/Dry Foot problem that was legalized by the U. S. Congress in 1966 as one of many laws designed to hurt Cuba by giving very special incentives for Cubans to defect to the United States.
        Tomas Regalado was born 68 years ago in Havana. Since 2009 he has been the Mayor of Miami. He told Aljazeera America Wednesday {January 13th} that Miami, already crowded if not overwhelmed with Cuban exiles, might not be ready to handle the latest influx from the Mexican border. Mayor Regalado said, "We don't need people living on the streets for weeks." Miami is not Florida's capital city; that honor is held by Tallahassee, which is far to the northeast. But Miami is Florida's most dominant city and also, in essence, the capital city for millions of Cuban exiles, making Miami truly an extension of old Havana.
       While Tomas Regalado, born in Havana 68 years ago, is the Mayor of Miami, Carlos Gimenez {above} has been the Mayor of Miami-Dade County since 2011. Mr. Gimenez was born in Havana 61 years ago. So there is not much difference between old Havana in Cuba and modern Miami in nearby South Florida.
       The Fanjul sugar monopoly reigned in Cuba from the 1920s until 1959. After the Cuban Revolution defeated the Batista dictatorship in January of 1959, in short order the Fanjul family -- now led by the brothers Alfonso and Jose Fanjul {above} -- took over the sugar monopoly in South Florida, the Dominican Republic, and the United States!! These ultra-rich brothers exemplify the basic fact that, despite a half-century of hostility, there is not a lot of difference between Havana, the capital of Cuba, and Miami.
Photo courtesy: The Cuban History.com.
        Little Havana is a neighborhood of about 80,000 people, mostly Cuban-Americans, in the heart of Miami, Florida. It's where many of the leaders of the Batista dictatorship quickly settled after the triumph of the Cuban Revolution on January 1, 1959. The still-living remnants from the ousted Batista dictatorship have grown very old, like the soon-to-be 90-year-old Fidel Castro, or have passed away. The first generation in Little Havana still has a visceral hatred of Mr. Castro and his revolution, even perpetrating the myth that Little Havana is the capital of Cuba, at least until they regain control of the pugnacious revolutionary island, in which case many would return to where Havana would be their capital. However, the second generation, born in Little Havana and more Americanized than their parents, is not as stuck in Cold War ideology regarding Cuba.


     The majority of the second generation of Cuban-Americans in Little Havana actually favor normalizing relations with Cuba, including the end of the U. S. embargo that has greatly harmed Cubans on the island and just as greatly harmed the image of the United States and democracy worldwide every year of its existence since 1962. Yet, because of Little Havana's first generation, the Miami area only sends extreme hard-liners to the U. S. Congress, and that includes first-term Senator Marco Rubio as well as both Diaz-Balart brothers {Lincoln Diaz-Balart first and then Mario Diaz-Balart, the sons of an important Batista Minister, Rafael Diaz-Balart)}.
       The talismanic and cataclysmic U. S. support of the Batista-Mafia dictatorship in Cuba was immediately continued in January of 1959 after the Batistianos and Mafiosi fled the victorious Cuban Revolution, with many of the leaders making a bee-line to {or back to} South Florida. With Vice President Richard Nixon, CIA Director Allen Dulles, and Secretary of State John Foster Dulles making the prime U. S. decisions regarding Cuba, the most hard-line exiles from the Batista-Mafia dictatorship were sent to the then-secretive Army School of the Americas at Fort Benning, Georgia, where the U. S. was already training exiles from U.S.-friendly Latin American dictatorships so they could be sent back to protect those dictators. One of the most visceral anti-Castro exiles from Cuba, of course, was Luis Posada Carriles. He quickly graduated as a 2nd Lt. at Fort Benning's then-secretive but now infamous and renamed Army School of the Americas. As you can see in the caption, 2nd Lt. Posada Carriles was a member of the Brigade 2506 that was quickly formed to serve as the CIA/Cuban exile army that would attack Revolutionary Cuba, which it did in April of 1961 at the Bay of Pigs after U. S. bombers had destroyed Cuba's only three military bases. To this day, Posada, who will turn 87 on February 15th, is a heralded and famous citizen of Miami thanks to incredible help, including from Miami members of the U. S. Congress, in getting out of prisons in Venezuela and Panama. But it is not as a soldier that Posada earned his fame; he has been a well-documented, decades-long, unabashed terrorist against anything connected to Fidel Castro or Revolutionary Cuba. He has bragged about deadly bombings of Cuban hotels, etc., and once even bragged about his primary role in the downing of the Cuban civilian airplane, Cubana Flight 455, but later recanted that claim. Posada and many of the other Fort Benning Cuban graduates became key CIA operatives and were well-funded and well-trained in various anti-Cuban, anti-Castro missions. With Castro vilified and Batista sanitized as the Batistianos controlled the Cuban narrative in the U. S., politically powerful Americans, such as the Bush dynasty, could become sycophantic allies of even the most extreme Cuban exiles without having to worry about it hurting their reputations.
      
    The all-time most powerful Cuban-American has been Jorge Mas Canosa. He too graduated from Fort Benning's Army School of the Americas as a 2nd Lt. {see photoand as an anti-Castro zealot of the first order. By the 1980s the Bush dynasty had anointed Mas Canosa as the leader of the Cuban exiles, as explained in detail by Julia E. Sweig in her book "What Everyone Needs To Know About Cuba." Sweig, a renowned and unquestioned Cuban expert, told how Mas Canosa was advised to study and then replicate AIPAC, the ultra-powerful Israeli lobby. He did, and created the Cuban American National Foundation, which...like AIPAC on behalf of Israel...quickly came to greatly influence the U. S. Congress and all Republican presidents on behalf of the most hard-line Cubans. The sanguine, proselytized, or intimidated American citizens have never questioned such notoriety or influence within their government. 
      In 1983 President Ronald Reagan made an eventful trip to Miami and had important discussions {see photo} with Mas Canosa. From that moment till his death in 1997, Mas Canosa, with the blessing of the Reagan-Bush administration {especially Bush}, was unchallenged as the leader of what essentially became the Cuban-government-in-exile. Mas Canosa became a billionaire in Miami and his dictation to Congress and to Presidents regarding Cuban issues equaled that of AIPAC regarding Israeli issues. Along with Julia E. Sweig, Ann Louise Bardach comprises America's two best expert journalist-authors regarding how Mas Canosa virtually created a Cuban-exile government within the bowels of the U. S. government. Ms. Bardach, in addition to her insightful books {especially "Cuba Confidential"} conducted a famed interview with Luis Posada Carriles for the New York Times. Carriles bragged about his terrorism and thanked U. S. taxpayers and Mas Canosa for funding his enterprises, but later recanted Mas Canosa's support.
       Peter Kornbluh at the National Security Archive in Washington {nsarchive.gwu.edu} has de-classified and posted on its website many U. S. government documents, including the one above from 1965, that Kornbluh says ties the top Cuban-exile leaders to bomb-making related to notorious terrorist acts.
     
      Starting with the two-term Reagan-Bush administration in the 1980s, Mas Canosa's influence on Congress and all Republican administrations was supreme. But, shown here with President Bill Clinton, Mas Canosa also easily controlled or overwhelmed even Democratic presidents on all matters related to Cuba. Mas Canosa was born in Santiago de Cuba in 1939 and died at age 58 in Coral Gables, Florida, just outside Miami, in 1997. By then his MasTec construction company was a billion-dollar enterprise and his name adorned major edifices and buildings all around Miami and Coral Gables.
        Mas Canosa left his three sons his anti-Castro Cuban fervor and his ultra-valuable, billion-dollar MasTec company. But the sons, like most second generation Cuban-Americans, are not nearly as hard-line on America's relations with Cuba as the first generation that their father gigantically epitomized. However, the moderate views of this generation of Cuban-Americans has not translated to moderate Cubans being elected either in Miami or to the U. S. Congress from Miami.
        In 1989 Ileana Ros-Lehtinen became the first in a continuing parade of Bush-connected extreme Miami hard-liners elected to the U. S. Congress. She was followed in short-order by Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Mario Diaz-Balart, sons of Rafael Diaz-Balart, a key Minister in Cuba's Batista dictatorship and later second in power and wealth only to Mas Canosa in Miami. In the above photo, that's Lincoln on the left and Mario on the right flanking Ros-Lehtinen.
          But it wasn't until the most visceral Cuban exiles had aligned themselves tightly with the Bush political and economic dynasty that a handful of anti-Castro zealots took almost total control of America's Cuban policy, especially in the U. S. Congress. That fact was indelibly manifested in 1976, the only year George H. W. Bush was CIA Director. But de-classified U. S. documents, as revealed by the highly respected Peter Kornbluh and others, show G.H.W. Bush had tight involvement with the CIA and Cuban exiles long before his infamous year {at least for Cubaas CIA Director. The Bush alliance with the Cuban hard-liners, cemented in 1976, became greatly exacerbated during G. H. W. Bush's two terms as Vice President and one-term as President, and then was just as strongly perpetrated during George W. Bush's two-term presidency and Jeb Bush's two terms as Governor of Florida. All along the way, the convenient nuance of top government officials being able to classify {hide} unseemly details from public knowledge greatly aided the Bush-Cuban alliance, at least until -- decades later -- great investigative journalists such as Peter Kornbluh, Robert Parry, etc., de-classified pertinent U. S. government documents related to nefarious Cuban acts.

      Not too long ago, Jim DeFede was a top columnist and the best investigative reporter at the Miami Herald. Then, fully knowing he was risking his high-profile job, Jim wrote a scathing article excoriating Miami's representatives -- namely Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and the Diaz-Balart brothers -- for what Jim considered their unconscionable support of Miami's most famed anti-Cuban Cuban-American terrorists. In the article, Jim pointed out that terrorism against innocent Cubans is/was the same as terrorism against Britons, Americans, etc. {Needless to say, Jim was soon an ex-Miami Herald columnist and investigator reporter, but he now works for the CBS television station in Miami}.
     Today Michael Putney is a high-profile, Miami-based television reporter and columnist. And he regularly writes Op-Ed editorial columns for the Miami Herald. He's angry President Obama might visit Cuba. Recently Mr. Putney's column was entitled: "THIS IS NOT THE TIME TO GO TO CUBA, MR. PRESIDENT." A sub-title stated: "Planned Trip To Cuba In March Would Make Obama Look Weak." Because I am a democracy-lover, I believe that in the United States of America, even in Miami, both sides of two-sides stories should see the light of day. Therefore, I believe the Miami Herald should be able to embrace the views of, say, a fired Jim DeFede as well as, say, a Michael Putney. But sadly, I do not believe that Miami is capable of such fairness although polls clearly reveal that most Miami citizens, even in Little Havana, favor Obama's rapprochement with Cuba as opposed to the hostility espoused by Mr. Putney and all four of Miami's members of the U. S Congress -- Ros-Lehtinen, Rubio, Diaz-Balart, and Curbelo. 
        If Cuban President Raul Castro and American President Barack Obama can agree to speak civilly to each other, both in person and on the phone as they did in 2015, and if those truly remarkable gestures can greatly benefit most Cubans and most Americans, perhaps continuing that sane approach in 2016 is better than the half-century of hostility that has benefited only a few self-serving antagonists.
   An out-dated relic of the Cold War.
  ****************************************



12.1.16

Obama, Cuba & 2016

Obama's Cuban Legacy
{Updated: Wednesday, January 13th, 2016}
    Mary Anastasia O'Grady of the Wall Street Journal revealed yesterday -- January 12, 2016 -- why Barack Obama is a great President and why the nation and the world should fear that a right-wing thug might replace him in January of 2017. In yesterday's Wall Street Journal on the eve of President Obama's State of the Union address that night, Ms. O'Grady wrote a scathingly distorted article typically spewing right-wing vitriol and anti-Obama propaganda. She ended the article with these exact words: "But Obama is busy about shaping his legacy. I'm not sure why: He's the first president to bow to a Saudi king, the first to open the door for Iran to get the bomb, and the first to prop up the Castros even while they hold a stolen Hellfire missile. His place in history is already secure." INDEED IT IS!!! President Obama's place in history and his already secure legacy have been and are vital because his two-term presidency, and hopefully his subsequent legacy, has and will help thwart the right-wing thugs that Ms. O'Grady champions. High-profile propagandists, I truly believe, demean America and the free world. 
Photo courtesy: REUTERS/ENRIQUE DE LA OSA.
        This photo was taken Monday -- Jan. 11th, 2016 -- and shows Lilianne Ploumen, the Netherlands Foreign Trade Minister, making an important announcement at Cuba's deepened and refurbished Mariel Port. She announced that Unilever, a Dutch-British company, will build a $35 million factory at Mariel's Economic Zone 28 miles southwest of Havana. The factory will make Sedal Shampoo, Rexona Deoderant, Omo Detergent, Lux Soap, and Close-Up Toothpaste. Ms. Ploumen was accompanied by 60 business executives and she said more Dutch companies will invest at Mariel. Unilever is the 9th and largest company to sign on in the Mariel Zone that is a key to Cuba's economic future. Ms. Ploumen said, "President Obama's advancements in normalizing relations with Cuba makes for a brighter day all around." Unilever will own 60% of the new factory to Cuba's 40%. Till recently, foreign companies were restricted to less than 50% ownership in Cuba, but the island is changing fast.
*****
President Obama: "The Republicans are peddling fiction."
"Lift the Cuban embargo." 
{State of the Union address; January 12, 2016}
       Tuesday -- January 12th, 2016 -- a decent man and a great President, Barack Obama, made his 8th and final State of the Union message. He discussed his two-term presidency and his hope for the future in a very tumultuous world. And he mentioned his legacy, which includes Cuba. Of the last eleven American presidents, Mr. Obama has shown the most decency, the most intelligence, and the most guts in trying to correct a Cuban policy that, perhaps, each year since the 1950s has caused more harm to the worldwide image of the United States and democracy than any other issue. His Herculean efforts to normalize relations with Cuba have, among other things, included the opening of embassies in Havana and Washington for the first time since 1961. Many of his other efficacious and humane Cuban plans have been...and will continue to be...blocked by a dysfunctional, Republican-dominated, self-serving, right-wing U. S. Congress, which also, with derogatory impunity, has opposed a caring President's efforts to provide affordable health care for all Americans, to enlist sane gun control methods to curb at least some of the unimaginable slaughter that occurs daily in America's great cities, and to narrow the abominable disparity between the rich and poor in the world's great democracy.
         When Mr. Obama was still a long-shot to be President of the United States, I had been a lifelong conservative Republican. His principled and astute campaigning convinced me that right-wingers had usurped my Party. In a two-party system, that left me one choice -- Mr. Obama's Democratic Party. Now into the 8th and final year of his presidency, he has more than fulfilled my expectations of him. The State of the U. S. Union today -- on January 12th, 2016 -- is in a better and more decent situation because of him.
       President Obama's efforts to normalize relations with Cuba have curbed right-wing U. S. assaults on 11 million innocents Cubans on the nearby island, and improved America's image around the world. Except for the right-wing tentacles in control of the U. S. Congress, he would have done more to improve U.S.-Cuban relations. But decades from now, what he did and what he tried to do in regards to Cuba will be heralded by democracy-lovers as a linchpin of his overall legacy that should forever be celebrated.
         Just before he leaves office in January of 2017 as America's 44th President, Barack Obama will turn 55-years-old on August 4th of this year. He'll still be in his prime and his two daughters will soon be away in college. As a former President, Mr. Obama will...make speeches, write books, and likely become President of a prestigious University, where he'll probably resume his old job as a Law Professor, either in the USA or the UK. But in 2017, conveniently, there is a job opening that Mr. Obama aspires to in the state of New York -- Secretary-General of the United Nations!! That position would be perfect for him. Unfortunately, that's why Benjamin Netanyahu and right-wingers in the U. S. Congress are already waging fierce campaigns to line up international opposition to the world's best candidate to be the next UN Secretary-General.
And Speaking of Cuba:
Photo courtesy: Robert Rausch/The New York Times.
       The New York Times this week advised its readers that Cuba's plush Valley of Vinales, depicted above, is one of the Top 10 places in the entire world to visit in this New Year of 2016. The NY Times said, "It's a lush valley of wooded hills and fields of dark red, with impressive limestone outcrops." I've been there and totally agree!
            The limestone mountains in Vinales Valley are unique in all the world and the world's top mountain-climbing clubs list it as a top priority for their eager members.
The Main Street in Vinales, Cuba.
      If you follow the advice of the New York Times and visit Vinales in 2016, there are neat, safe, and quaint hotel rooms as well as rooms in private homes you could rent.
Vinales is a nice, bucolic drive southwest of Havana.
      Cuba's men's volleyball team has ample reason to celebrate. They went to Edmonton and upset a powerful Canadian team in three straight sets -- 25-15, 25-21, and 25-21. The victory clinched a spot in this summer's Rio Olympics for Cuba!!!
**********************************




   

11.1.16

Blaming Cuba...For Everything!!

Still An American Obsession
         Of all the journalists and authors in America, Barbara Demick is one of the most honored. The Yale-educated Ms. Demick is the top foreign correspondent for the Los Angeles Times and she served as the Beijing bureau chief in China from 2008 to 2014. She recently took her son on a visit to Cuba and then documented that trip with a book-length essay in one of America's highest profile and most respected magazines -- The New Yorker. The Jan. 10th-2016 essay was entitled "Shopping In Cuba." It seems the sophisticated Ms. Demick expected her shopping experience in Cuba to resemble a routine visit to one of America's most modern malls. Well, it wasn't quite like that and Ms. Demick equated it to...North Korea.
         And speaking of North Korea, Barbara Demick's award-winning 2010 book was entitled: "NOTHING TO ENVY: Real Lives in North Korea." So, she knows North Korea. After her trip to Cuba, Ms. Demick wrote in her high-profile Jan. 10-2016 article in The New Yorker these exact words: "But Cuba also looks to me like a North Korea with Palm Trees. To be sure, Cuba has evolved politically, investing in education and health care rather than weapons of mass destruction." Ummmmm...? Ms. Demick's grudging compliment to Cuba regarding its educational and health priorities seemed to be an obligatory back-handed admission.
      The rest of Barbara Demick's essay about her trip to Cuba seemed intent on demeaning the island by comparing it to North Korea and apparently trying to differentiate today's island from the halcyon days of the 1950s when the U.S.-backed Batista-Mafia dictatorship had nice shopping areas -- at least for the very rich if not for everyday Cubans. In this week's essay in The New Yorker, Ms. Demick wrote: "The problem might be that I spent half of my trip in Trinidad, a cobblestoned colonial city on the Caribbean coast." She detested Trinidad, writing about, "My inability to obtain ice cream for my son. When we finally found it, on the menu of an expatriate beach club in Havana, it arrived melted. And the waitress couldn't find a spoon." Ummmm....? Obviously, Ms. Demick is accustomed to finding perfect ice cream, along with handy spoons, when she shops at America's modern malls. BUT NOT IN TRINIDAD, the quint little city on Cuba's south-central "Caribbean coast."
This map shows the location of Trinidad in south-central Cuba.
        I have been to the cobble-stoned colonial city of Trinidad, Cuba. It clings very proudly to its splendid, colorful traditions. I have mentioned several times in these Cubaninsider essays that Trinidad was my favorite Cuban city because of the friendliness of its citizens as well as its nice, unique architecture.
            I distinctly remember that, when I visited Trinidad, I had some delicious ice cream and even got to eat it with an appropriate spoon. If, on the other hand, I found some things not as elite or convenient as in the United States, I never complained about it either in Cuba or when I returned to Wyoming, USA.
       This is the beach that adorns Trinidad. Tourists have often rated Varadero Beach in Cuba as "One of the world's most beautiful beaches." I have also eaten ice cream at an outdoor table at Varadero Beach and I don't dispute its world-class rating. {On that above map you can see that Varadero is in northeastern Cuba just an hour's drive along the coastal highway from Havana}. Yet, I still consider Trinidad even more beautiful than Varadero but I didn't visit either Cuban city with the predisposed idea of demeaning them.
       Which brings me back around to Barbara Demick's high-profile excoriation of Cuba, especially Trinidad, in this week's The New Yorker magazine. Her essay included the New York Times photo depicted above, with the caption reading: "In the markets and shops of Cuba are an ample supply {of things} but certain mundane provisions are not." Ummmmm...? One such "mundane" thing missing in Cuba, according to Ms. Demick, was good ice cream...and a handy spoon to eat it. Going to such mundane lengths to blame Revolutionary Cuba would be alright, I reckon, if such essays from high-profile American journalists-authors were fair and balanced, which they seldom are. While Revolutionary Cuba can justifiably be blamed for a lot of things, including perhaps the abundance of overly ripe bananas in this photo, when it comes to Cuba, there is a lot of blame to go around from America's standpoint as opposed to just blaming Revolutionary Cuba. But most U. S. journalists prefer just one side of a two-sided story.
        Perhaps, for example, the U. S. should be blamed for its unconscionable support of the thieving, murderous Batista-Mafia dictatorship in Cuba beginning in 1952, which spawned a notable revolution.
       Perhaps, for example, the United States should be blamed for supporting the Batista-Mafia dictatorship instead of supporting Cuban mothers like these who were the prime victims of Batista's sheer brutality.
        Perhaps, for example, the U. S. should be blamed for not helping or even acknowledging the extreme poverty rampant in Cuba during the Batista-Mafia reign, facts readily reported by the New York Times.
        Perhaps, for example, the U. S. should be blamed for Mafia thugs like Meyer Lansky looting satchel-full loads of money, as reported by Life Magazine, while most Cubans were mired in abject poverty and many Cuban mothers were marching in the streets to protest the murders of their children to quell dissent.
          Or, perhaps, the U. S. should be blamed for necessitating a revolution that would, and did, respond to the extreme excesses of the Batista-Mafia dictatorship with the revolution that triumphed in 1959.
         Or, perhaps, the U. S. should be blamed for American Burt Glinn being in Cuba in January of 1959 photographing Fidel Castro's triumphal arrival in Havana while, perhaps, Burt Glinn could have been photographing much calmer scenes in the U. S.
                Or, perhaps, the U. S. should be blamed for the ill-conceived CIA-Cuban exile attack at the Bay of Pigs in Cuba in April of 1961, which failed to recapture Cuba but only served to strengthen its resolve.
      Or, perhaps, the U. S. should be blamed for devising and executing the stupidly conceived invasion at the Bay of Pigs that only served to greatly enhance the already legendary reputation of Fidel Castro, who still wears the Bay of Pigs banner at age 89.
       Or, perhaps, the U. S. should be blamed for montages like this on display today in Cuba and the Caribbean honoring the 73 victims of Cubana Flight 455, the civilian airplane bombed out of the sky on October 6, 1976, by very well-known terrorists.
This graphic is courtesy of: Carlos Latuff.
        Or, perhaps, the U. S. should be blamed for imposing on Cuba, since 1962, the longest and cruelest embargo in history, one strongly opposed, as yearly demonstrated in a UN vote, by America's very best friends all around the world.

Which brings me back to Barbara Demick:


   I fully recognize that Barbara Demick is one of America's greatest journalists and authors. She has won a Pulitzer Prize for journalism and a National Book Award as an author. Yet, I would like to make this suggestion in the form of a blogger's letter: "Ms. Demick, your long, high-profile essay in The New Yorker on Jan.10-2016 unfairly demonized the island of Cuba while sanctimoniously sanitizing America's share of the blame for problems in Cuba. When I visited Cuba, I ate delicious ice cream with a spoon in Trinidad, Havana, and Varadero. I accept the fact that, on your visit, you had trouble finding good ice cream, or even a good spoon, in Trinidad and Havana. But is that a reason for excoriating Cuba? Other than reluctantly admitting that Cuba prioritizes heath and education for its citizens, could you not have discovered some other everyday positive element on the island during your visit? Or was your mind predisposed to search out just the negatives, such as the lack of good ice cream? And if so, is that not typical of American journalists, when the topic is Cuba, reporting only one side of two-sided stories?"


****************************************



cubaninsider: "The Country That Raped Me" (A True Story)

cubaninsider: "The Country That Raped Me" (A True Story) : Note : This particular essay on  Ana Margarita Martinez  was first ...