The sole publisher of Cubaninsider, Rich Haney, has passionately studied Cuba day and night since the 1980s and he has visited the island. He is a fiercely pro-democracy conservative Republican from Virginia and he believes the Cuban Revolution and Revolutionary Cuba say more about the United States than they say about Cuba.
7.12.15
6.12.15
A Very Special Cuban
{Updated for Monday, December 7th, 2015}
UFirst:
Today -- December 7th -- is a reminder of the Day of Infamy for America back in 1941. A surprise Japanese attack ushered America into World War II. The graphic above depicts the U. S. ships sunk, damaged or destroyed. That day, 2,403 Americans were killed and 1,178 others were severely wounded. My Uncle Ritchie, a proud member of the U. S. Navy and the man I was named for, was at Pearl Harbor that day.
29.11.15
Blocking U.S.-Cuban Thaw
It's Easy As Pie, Really
{Monday, November 30th, 2015}
{Monday, November 30th, 2015}
With the exception of The Tampa Tribune, there are very few news outlets in the United States that have the necessary combination of courage-competence-integrity to tell the truth about U.S.-Cuban relations, a nexus that has drastically affected both nations since the USS Maine mysteriously exploded in Havana Harbor in 1898, giving the U. S. the pretext to gain control of Cuba from Spain in the Spanish-American War. On November 27th, 2015, an article in The Tampa Tribune written by excellent journalist Paul Guzzo expertly updated those ramifications. The article was illustrated by the Associated Press photo above that depicts Cuban fishermen. Guzzo's first sentence was: "It has been six months since the United States removed Cuba from its list of state sponsors of terrorism, but the legacy of the past designation has lingered on, hurting attempts to finally normalize relations between the two nations."
Guzzo mentions that "There are over $8 billion dollars outstanding in property claims against Cuba." Those claims, of course, date back to January 1, 1959, when the Cuban Revolution overthrew the U.S.-backed Batista-Mafia dictatorship, chasing the leaders to safer havens, mostly nearby Miami. Guzzo added, "Under U. S. law, the Cuban embargo can only be lifted after the two nations settle the property claims."
In other words, there is zero chance that the U. S. embargo of Cuba, first imposed in 1962, can "be lifted" despite the optimism following the announcements on Dec. 19-2014 by Presidents Obama and Castro they they had agreed to "normalize relations." The abnormally bellicose relations between Cuba and the U. S. since 1959 have simply enriched and empowered too many Cuban exiles, especially in Miami. From 1959 till 1962, all-out efforts by the U. S. and the Cuban exiles to recapture Cuba included...assassination attempts against Cuba's revolutionary leaders, the Bay of Pigs military attack, and the U. S. embargo of Cuba that exists to this very day. And then by 1966 the U. S. Congress had come under the total control of anti-Castro extremists as far as America's Cuban policy was/is concerned. Thus in 1966 the infamous Cuban Adjustment Act began an endless stream of "legal" U. S. laws powered by two purposes: {1} Hurt Cuba, and {2} enrich and empower the Cuban exile anti-Castro leaders. Both purposes have been infinitely realized, thanks to unchallenged post-1966 laws such as The Torricelli Bill, Helms-Burton Act, etc. In that milieu, overwhelmed by fear or political correctness, American politicians and jounalists, with few exceptions, were persuaded to either support or at least not object to even excesses of the U.S. Cuban policy. That has particularly been true since 1976 when anti-Castro terrorists bombed the civilian airliner Cubana Flight 455, killing all 73 on board, and loudly proclaiming in the Miami media that it was "the biggest blow yet against Castro!" The top Cuban-American newsman in Miami, Emilio Milian, voiced opposition to such things, and he was car-bombed. Since 1976 very few U. S. politicians or journalists have taken up for people like Emilio Milian -- or former Miami Herald columnist Jim DeFede who denounced terrorism against Cuba -- but a lot have supported an American Cuban policy that the rest of the world, as indicated by a yearly United Nations vote each October, opposes as extremely partisan and an affront to the supposed pillars of the U. S. democracy. Along the way, propagandized Americans don't much care.
Paul Guzzo's Nov. 27-2015 article in The Tampa Tribune discussed ramifications of a U. S. Cuban policy designed to hurt Cuba and enrich/empower Cuban-Americans. He wrote: "6 months ago the U. S. removed Cuba from the list of state sponsors of terrorism." It had been on the books for 33 years as a prime excuse for the Cubans in Miami, backed by the U. S. government, to sue Cuba in Miami courts without Cuba being represented to defend itself. The verdicts, of course, in the Miami courtrooms were pre-ordained. Guzzo wrote: "In 2003, when a Cuban plane was hijacked and flown to Key West, for instance, Cuba demanded the plane's return, but it was instead auctioned. The money was used to settle part of a $27 million judgment won by a Cuban-American woman who said she had unwittingly married a Cuban spy as part of his cover." Guzzo referenced other successful anti-Cuban lawsuits: "...one granting $2.8 billion that, with interest, is now $3.2 billion." Yes, billion with a "b." He also mentioned "another for $49.3 million and another for $454 million" awarded to Miami families for men allegedly killed or executed on missions to Cuba. Guzzo added, "In each of the lawsuits the plaintiffs won by default when Cuba chose not to defend itself in court."
Paul Guzzo's Nov. 27-2015 article in the The Tampa Tribune indicated that the U. S., even with Cuba off the terrorist list, can still "freeze" Cuban assets. He mentioned the "over $200 million in Cuban assets the U. S. government has frozen" relating to Cuba's share of money from U.S.-Cuban phone calls. Guzzo pointed out the George W. Bush administration, tightly aligned with the Miami Cubans, "seized more than $100 million in long-distance fees in 2002 to pay some of those judgments" that were routinely made.
Remember what Guzzo wrote: "Under U. S. law, the Cuban embargo can only be lifted after the two nations settle the property claims." Guzzo says there are "$8 billion" worth of claims outstanding. Even if Cuba had that much loose change lying around in Havana, it wouldn't pay such U. S. claims even though, indeed, it has settled property claims with other countries. But against the U. S., Cuba has claims of its own that it would love to have arbitrated by international courts. Cuba has minutely made the case about the untold billions of dollars the U. S. embargo has cost it since 1962 and Cuba believes an international court would rule the embargo illegal. Moreover, Cuba can easily document numerous terrorist acts against innocent Cubans that have been victims of coastal airplane and speed-boat strafings, hotel bombings, and, of course, the bombing of Cubana Flight 455 that killed 73 civilians including teenage athletes.
**********************
Paul Guzzo's Nov. 27-2015 article in the The Tampa Tribune indicated that the U. S., even with Cuba off the terrorist list, can still "freeze" Cuban assets. He mentioned the "over $200 million in Cuban assets the U. S. government has frozen" relating to Cuba's share of money from U.S.-Cuban phone calls. Guzzo pointed out the George W. Bush administration, tightly aligned with the Miami Cubans, "seized more than $100 million in long-distance fees in 2002 to pay some of those judgments" that were routinely made.
Remember what Guzzo wrote: "Under U. S. law, the Cuban embargo can only be lifted after the two nations settle the property claims." Guzzo says there are "$8 billion" worth of claims outstanding. Even if Cuba had that much loose change lying around in Havana, it wouldn't pay such U. S. claims even though, indeed, it has settled property claims with other countries. But against the U. S., Cuba has claims of its own that it would love to have arbitrated by international courts. Cuba has minutely made the case about the untold billions of dollars the U. S. embargo has cost it since 1962 and Cuba believes an international court would rule the embargo illegal. Moreover, Cuba can easily document numerous terrorist acts against innocent Cubans that have been victims of coastal airplane and speed-boat strafings, hotel bombings, and, of course, the bombing of Cubana Flight 455 that killed 73 civilians including teenage athletes.
Even Cuba's brilliant, influential, and highly respected news anchor, 27-year-old Cristina Escobar -- on air via Cuban and regional newscasts and while covering the U.S.-Cuban diplomatic sessions in Washington earlier this year -- has referenced the Miami court decisions against Cuba that Paul Guzzo himself referenced on November 27th in The Tampa Tribune. Escobar frames it this way: "Miami courts make outrageous and successful lawsuits against Cuba when Cuba it is not even represented. So, I wonder if the U. S. would be so kind as to allow Cuba to be represented in an unbiased international courtroom, like in the Hague, when Cuba would be allowed to defend itself and then present its lawsuits against the U. S. for such things as the theft and continued illegal occupation of Guantanamo Bay since 1903 and the illegal embargo/blockade since 1962, not to mention the long and deadly lists of terrorist acts against us."
Even if Americans dismiss the facts respected journalist Paul Guzzo referenced in his Nov. 27-2015 article in The Tampa Tribune or conveniently dispute the points raised by Cuba's superstar news anchor Cristina Escobar, no one can deny that there are two sides to the U.S.-Cuban conundrum. Moreover, perhaps it is time for both sides to be fairly aired in both nations. In the U. S., that would mean my democracy would have to cease allowing just a handful of revengeful Cuban-Americans to mandate, decade after decade, biased and undemocratic U. S. laws that harm everyone but them.
Meanwhile:
This beautiful little Cuban girl is a reminder of the uniquely and long-standing enigmatic nature of U.S.-Cuban relations. Her name is Gema Hernandez Perez.
Famed American actor Danny Glover kicked off the Thanksgiving-Christmas holiday season by flying to Cuba to meet Gema. Her parents -- Gerardo Hernandez and Adriana Perez -- were glad to oblige. Danny had visited Gerardo when it was believed he would spend the rest of his life in prison in Victorville, California. As the most famed member of the famed Cuba 5, Gerardo had been sentenced to life in prison by a Miami court for being an alleged Cuban spy. The Cuba 5 gained international fame as many tried to prove they were in Miami trying to prevent terrorist acts against innocent Cubans. After serving almost 15 years of their sentences, the Cuba 5 are back in Cuba as heroes. Gerardo arrived back in Cuba in December of 2014 in the famous swap for the imprisoned American Alan Gross, a stunning exchange that allowed for Presidents Obama and Castro to announce plans for a thaw in U.S.-Cuban relations. Adriana, badly wanting a baby by her beloved husband Gerardo, was not allowed to visit him in his U. S. prison. Also, she was convinced he would never be released. That's when, amazingly, a lot of friendly people -- including Danny Glover and a powerful U. S. Senator {you can google that information} arranged for Gerardo's sperm to be flown from California to Cuba to impregnate Adriana!!!!!!!!!! Sorry for all the exclamation points, but neither I nor a great novelist could make this up. Shortly after Gerardo was freed, he was there when Adriana gave birth to Gema in a Cuban hospital. On his trip to Cuba to see the little girl that owes him so much, Danny Glover told the press: "When I joined the liberation committee for the Cuba Five and studied the men, I saw in them a bridge to the world of justice and equality that we want to build."
Gema and her proud parents, Adriana and Gerardo.
Danny Glover saying and waving good-bye to Gema Hernandez Perez.
Uh, did I say amazing?
28.11.15
Unraveling U.S.-Cuba Detente
It Was Doomed From The Start
This photo was taken yesterday -- Friday, November 27th, 2015. It shows angry Cubans protesting at the Ecuadorian embassy in Havana. The sign, translated to English, reads: "Justice! My visa or my money." Ecuador had been the only nation that allowed Cubans onto its soil without a visa. But that, coupled with fears that U.S.-Cuban detente might spell the end to United States laws that favor only Cubans, prompted thousands of Cubans to fly to Ecuador and then trek north before finally stepping onto U. S. soil at the Mexican border. Cubans, and only Cubans, have permanent U. S. residency and instant welfare the moment they step onto U. S. soil. Thousands were on that journey till they were stopped by Nicaragua at its border with Costa Rica. Tired of the turmoil, Ecuador changed its no-visa rule for Cubans. These Cubans still in Havana were demanding either their visas or the prompt return of the money they had paid for them.
The New York Times this week used this photo to show anti-Cuban demonstrations in the section of Miami known at Little Havana. From Kennedy in 1963 to Carter in the 1970s to Clinton in the 1990s, Democratic U. S. presidents have tried to normalize relations with Cuba. Each time fierce opposition, originating in Miami's Little Havana neighborhood and then easily extending to the U. S. Congress, has not only stopped those plans but resulting conflicts have been used to sharply strengthen America's anti-Cuban policy. That's why the 1966 Cuban Adjustment Act was followed by the Torricelli Bill and the Helms-Burton Act -- all essentially dictated to the U. S. Congress by Fidel Castro's most visceral Miami opponents. {To fully understand those congressional laws you need to study two seminal books: Ann Louise Bardach's "Cuba Confidential: Love and Vengeance in Miami and Havana" and Julie E. Sweig's "What Everyone Needs to Know About Cuba."}. Those decades-old congressional laws have had two purposes: {1} to hurt Cuba; and {2} to enrich and empower Cuban exiles and Cuban-Americans. They have succeeded in both ventures -- hurting Cuba while enriching and empowering Cubans who defect to the U. S. For example, since 1966 what is known as the Wet Foot/Dry foot law encourages Cubans to defect to the U. S. and once their front foot touches U. S. soil they have permanent residency and instantly begin receiving welfare. That law benefits only Cubans and discriminates against all other would-be migrants, not to mention unwitting U. S. taxpayers. It also casts, around the world, an undemocratic image of the U. S. Yet, Wet Foot/Dry Foot has prevailed since 1966 and it will remain. The conflict on the Costa Rica-Nicaragua border is merely an ephemeral offshoot. If it doesn't end Mr. Obama's detente, something else will soon evolve that will.
This is Nicaraguan General Julio Cesar Aviles. It is his soldiers that have blocked the border between Costa Rica and Nicaragua. He says, "People entering or passing through Nicaragua must do it legally. That includes Cubans benefiting from special United States laws that harm everyone else, creating real chaos."
This AFP photo shows a Cuban woman, stranded at the Costa Rican-Nicaraguan border for a week, drying her clothes yesterday. She is now just one of thousands in the same very irritating predicament.
This AFP photo shows Costa Rica's Ambassador to the Netherlands, Jorge Urbina, testifying at the International Court in the Hague concerning Costa Rica's heated border disputes with Nicaragua that date back to 2010. Now the blocking of Cubans at that border by Nicaraguan soldiers is tossing fuel onto the smoldering flames and bringing other nations into the fray to try to de-escalate the rising tensions.
This Marco Ruiz/Miami Herald graphic explains why many Cubans are stuck at the Costa Rica-Nicaragua border. The juicy 1966 Wet Foot/Dry Foot law this month had a confluence with President Obama's efforts to normalize relations with Cuba, causing many Cubans and many human traffickers to think that lucrative incentives for Cubans only might finally end. Ecuador, till this week, was the only nation that allowed Cubans to fly in without a visa. Then from Ecuador they would travel north through Colombia, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Honduras, and Guatemala to reach the U.S.-Mexican border where they would be home free with welfare the moment they touched U. S. soil. But Nicaragua, one of Cuba's closest allies, altered those plans just a bit by closing its border with Costa Rica. It's a headache the region didn't need.
It was at high noon on Demceber 17th, 2014, that President Obama went on television to tell the American people that he and Cuban President Raul Castro had agreed to normalize relations between the two countries. Indeed, since the Cuban Revolution chased the Batista-Mafia dictatorship off the island {mostly to Miami} on January 1, 1959, Obama has come much closer than his ten predecessors to actually normalizing relations with the largest Caribbean island. He took Cuba off the Sponsors of Terrorism list; he exchanged notable Cuban prisoners in the U. S. for two notable American prisoners in Cuba; he orchestrated the reopening of embassies in Havana and Cuba for the first time since 1961; he removed some of the restrictions on Americans visiting Cuba; etc. However, President Obama -- like the three previous Democratic Presidents Kennedy, Carter, and Clinton -- will discover a hard fact of life regarding Cuba: There are too many people making too much money from America's Batistiano-like Cuban policy for him to change it anymore than he already has. In fact, when Kennedy, Carter, and Clinton tried to change it, they were so powerfully rebuked that harsher anti-Cuban laws resulted each time -- such as The Cuban Adjustment Act, Wet Foot/Dry Foot, The Torricelli Bill, and The Helms-Burton Act. The same thing will happen to President Obama's honorable efforts regarding Cuba. Sure, the impasse on the Costa Rica-Nicaragua border will resolve soon enough, but other provocations are just around the complex Cuban corner.
**********************
Cubans enticed to defect to the United States are not the only ones laughing out loud at U. S. laws -- such as Wet Foot/Dry Foot -- designed to enrich and empower Cubans and only Cubans. The rest of the world, except for the embarrassment it causes America's best democratic friends, is laughing out loud too.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
cubaninsider: "The Country That Raped Me" (A True Story)
cubaninsider: "The Country That Raped Me" (A True Story) : Note : This particular essay on Ana Margarita Martinez was first ...
-
And from 1959 till 2023 it always starts with sanitizing Batista's, the Mafia's and the USA's Cuba from 1952 till 1959 !! ...
-
Three of 7 Siblings Still Live { Thursday, March 30th , 2017 } On Sunday, March 27th in Havana, Augustina Castro died at ag...
-
Any Excuse Will Work ! ! ! ! { Monday, January 8th, 2018 } pretext : noun -- A reason presented as an excuse to justify a course of a...