15.12.17

Rubio: Too Extreme For Miami?

It begins to seem that is true!
{Saturday, December 16th, 2017}
      Like many thousands of others, Luisa Yanez has come a long, long way since her birth in Havana. Today she is one of the three ultra-powerful Editorial Board Editors at the Miami Herald. Ms. Yanez is one reason I'm surprised that even the Miami Herald's Editorial Masters seem to be getting fed-up with Miami's two-term U. S. Senator Marco Rubio whom, for all intents and purposes, President Trump has anointed America's latest Cuban dictator who is intent, after all these decades, to overthrow the 1959 Cuban Revolutionary triumph. The Herald, for example, rebuked Rubio when he spoke out against the long-standing Wet Foot-Dry Foot law that encouraged Cuban defections to the U. S. because the moment their feet touched U. S. soil they were home free with special privileges. President Obama finally ended that particular discriminatory practice but, with the Republican Trump in the White House, Rubio expects to reverse all of the Obama-orchestrated positives related to Cuba. And this week the Miami Herald, in a major article apparently approved by its three Editorial Masters, including Ms. Yanez, again seems to sharply rebuke Dic...uh, I mean...SENATOR Rubio. I'm a bit surprised by this article but I find it very interesting that this propagandized generation of mainstream Americans has swallowed more of Rubio's carefully fabricated "choirboy" image than have powerful Miami Herald Cuban-American Editorial Editors like the Havana-born Luisa Yanez.
      The Miami Herald this week published a scathing article against Marco Rubio that was co-written by a Cuban-Cuban, Nuiris Higueras, who owns the upscale Atelier Restaurant in Havana. After the very decent U. S. President Obama made positive overtures to Cuba -- the first such gestures from the U. S. since 1959 -- Nuiris and thousands of other Cubans on the island became successful entrepreneurs making money to support their families. Then in 2017 President Trump, especially after anointing Rubio as his Cuban dictator, began reversing Obama's kindnesses that greatly benefited Cubans in Cuba as well as Cubans in Miami. This week -- in the article written by Nuiris and three other successful female entrepreneurs on the island -- the Miami Herald was fair enough to give the other side of what has long been a one-sided perspective of U.S.-Cuban relations. The MIAMI HERALD  article is entitled: "U. S. Policy Is Hurting Cuba's Entrepreneurs." As noted, Nuiris and three other female Cuban entrepreneurs -- Yamina Vicente, Julia de la Rosa, and Marla Recio -- co-wrote that article. It excoriated America's Cuban dictator, Rubio, for what he is doing to totally innocent families in Cuba. And to its credit the Miami Herald this week allowed those four decent Cuban women to expose the blatant and self-serving lies that both the United States government and the mainstream United States media has, for decades, allowed Counter Revolutionaries like RUBIO to get away with WHILE ALL THE WHILE FEATHERING THEIR OWN ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL NESTS.
               With consummate ease, Marco Rubio can lie to the American people about why he so cruelly attacks Cubans on the island -- "to hurt the Castros." But of course, he can't lie to the Cuban female entrepreneurs who wrote the Miami Herald article. They repeatedly call Rubio a liar and repeatedly marvel why the American people allow him to get away with it. They mock Rubio for repeatedly claiming he "supports the private sector." They mock his "claims to be the leading architect of the administration policy toward our country." They mock his cowardice in refusing to "meet with us." AND BECAUSE OF MARCO RUBIO they say: "Many of us now must decide which of our workers to lay off." But despite the fair-minded article in Rubio's home-town newspaper, don't expect the propagandized or uncaring American people to decide between the self-serving, cruel-minded Rubio and decent, intelligent, hard-working Cuban women like Nuiris Higueras who don't deserve to be continually punished on their sovereign island by a greedy, self-serving "choirboy" hiding behind the skirts of the world's Superpower to further his personal agendas.
      Another young Cuban woman who co-wrote that blistering anti-Rubio article in the Miami Herald is Marla Recio. Thanks to openings provided by President Obama, Marla created a thriving Events Planning business on the island of Cuba. Trump & Rubio, she wants the world to know, is destroying it. Marla was also featured in the June 16-2017 New York Times article entitled "In Cuba, Trump Reversal Could Hurt Small Business." And Marla this week made her opinions about Trump & Rubio known to Collin Laverty, one of America's prime advocates for sane and decent U.S.-Cuban cooperation. She told Laverty: "They are deteriorating the quality of life for Cuban families." {She was blaming Marco Rubio & Donald Trump}But Americans are easily programmed to believe that Marla is the bad guy and Marco is the good guy.
      Shamefully backed by President Donald Trump, Senator Marco Rubio believes that he alone should be allowed to dictate America's Cuban Policy. He is thus, with Trump in the White House, determined to reverse Obama's Herculean attempts to normalize relations with Cuba...meaning Rubio wants to finally regain Batistiano-like control of Cuba with a Policy that the rest of the world, including Obama's USA, condemned by a 191-to-ZERO vote in the United Nations. Rubio's Cuban Policy is also condemned by most Cubans in Miami although to this day Miami only sends Counter Revolutionary extremists like Rubio to the United States Congress. On Nov. 9th-2017 the Trump-Rubio regime in Washington announced 180 new harsh and cruel sanctions against Cuba. Rubio then shamefully and sanctimoniously announced that if it weren't for a few far-out liberals he could have included more than a mere 180 new assaults on innocent Cubans. Of course, Rubio always claims that everything he does is to hurt the Castros. It is believed by every unbiased Cuban expert I'm aware of that Rubio, and the shameful elements of the mainstream media that protects him, know FULL WELL that he is lying to further his revenge, economic, and political goals. As the aforementioned Miami Herald article acutely points out, Rubio's actions are hurting the most decent and the most deserving families on the island. The four brilliant and courageous women who wrote that article this week begged Rubio to come to Cuba and sit down and discuss the situation with them...or allow them to come to Washington to meet with him. Rubio has not had the decency or the guts to respond to them although, of course, he has hosted and powerfully supported in Washington the most visceral Counter Revolutionary dissidents on the island.
    The above photo-graphic, I think, defines today's U. S. government that MOST AMERICANS believe is bought-and-paid-for so it can primarily serve a handful of greedy billionaires. The image above was taken from Fox News, the right-wing media outlet that supports Marco Rubio's blatant goal of turning the U. S. democracy into a BATISTA-LIKE regime that ruled and brutalized Cuba from 1952 till 1959. Complicating the extreme right-wing influence of Fox News is the fact that the other five U. S. news networks -- CNN, MSNBC, NBC, ABC, and CBS -- are all extreme left-wing outfits that have neither the courage nor the integrity to challenge anything Rubio does to innocent Cubans while Trump is in the White House or when-if Rubio or some Batistiano like him takes it over. For example, none of the aforementioned top six U. S. television networks have even had the guts or decency to question Miami-related terrorism against Cuba that includes deadly hotel bombings, the deadly bombing of a child-laden Cuban civilian airplane, an historic series of assassinations and/or assassination attempts, etc. So what if, considering the never-ending Batistiano ties to Republican administrations, the U. S. simply nuked Cuba??? If so, judging by past acceptance, the U. S. media would either applaud or be too afraid to question such an atrocity. So now, study the Fox News graphic above. I believe it might make unbiased democracy-loving Americans cringe because of what it means today and what it portends for America's future. Throughout 2016 during the Republican presidential primary Trump and Rubio were bitter enemies. But as president, Trump is so afraid of Rubio's Little Havana roots in Miami that Trump fulfilled Rubio's second most-cherished goal -- next to being President himself -- and that was to be named by President Trump as America's Cuban dictator, which he essentially is today. But at least, with the quotation above, Trump surely called a spade a spade: "Sheldon Adelson would have total control over Rubio." AND, YES, AMERICA...that is quite possible thanks to a U. S. Supreme Court ruling that permits billionaires to make virtual unlimited donations to or purchases of politicians, including those with dangerous designs on the U. S. presidency. So, you ask, who is Sheldon Adelson?
      Now 84-years-old, Sheldon Adelson as of December-2017 is reportedly worth in excess of $38.6 billion. He owns lavish gambling palaces in Las Vegas and Singapore. As a controversial figure, he also owns the top newspapers in Nevada and Israel, presumably to help blunt criticism of his properties, politics, or his pundits.
     Even above his casinos and his newspapers, Sheldon Adelson is best known for using his extreme wealth to influence politics and politicians from coast to coast.
       Spending a mere $100 million or so to influence politicians & political issues is a mere drop-in-the-bucket as far as Sheldon Adelson's total wealth is concerned.
       Thus, during the 2016 Republican presidential primary, the 17 contenders...uh, yes, there were 17 -- including the four listed above -- sought some of that Adelson money and, apparently, were willing to sell their political beliefs to get some of it.
     But it appeared that Little Havana's Marco Rubio was the most eager politician to cash in, economically and politically, with bundles of Sheldon Adelson's cash.
       Of course, throughout the presidential primary Fox News reported that Marco Rubio was in line to get the lion's share of Sheldon Adelson's political buy-outs.
      As it turned out, Marco Rubio's 2016 presidential bid soon fizzled out but it is believed that he is accumulating enough cash to possibly purchase the post in 2020.
     Of course, Marco Rubio's well-known taste for money-burgers meshes with an opportune time in America's high-stakes political games: The U. S. Supreme Court in a recent ruling, many believe, powerfully favored the influence of billionaires over the long-standing democratic Founding Father's principle of ONE PERSON-ONE VOTE.
     Yet, the biggest reason that someone like Marco Rubio has a viable chance to reshape the proud American democracy into a Batistiano farse lies in what the mainstream U. S. media has evolved into -- namely, propaganda outfits as opposed to news-gathering journalism. The right-wing media, like Fox, propagandizes for a right-wing extremist, like Rubio. But the left-wing media -- NBC, MSNBC, CNN, CBS, ABC, the NY Times & the Washington Post -- separately and collectively propagandize for an extreme left-wing America while putting the actual coverage and deliverance of NEWS far into the background. As indicated by the propaganda cover above, even the left-wing U. S. media supports Rubio BECAUSE the left-wing billionaire media owners believe Rubio is Washington's most For-Sale politician and, in time, they can purchase him but in the meantime just reshaping America's democracy is fine with left-wing extremists and right-wing extremists alike.
     Therefore, both right-wing & left-wing extremists in the U. S. latch onto Rubio's For-Sale extremism as "The Republican Savior." In other words, drastically changing the Founding Fathers' version of America makes for strange bedfellows and the dichotomy personified by the malleable Rubio -- meaning FOR-SALE Rubio -- appeals to both right-wing and left-wing American extremists.
       And so, whether it's left-wing or right-wing propaganda extolling the "virtures" of Marco Rubio, America democracy-lovers should look past the mainstream U. S. media and Google some basic Rubio facts. Rubio's biggest asset is that billionaires know he's For Sale and...DEMOCRACY IS THE PRIME VICTIM.
  Ken Silverstein is a great investigative journalist.
      For many years Ken Silverstein has earned plaudits for his investigative journalism while working for respected publications like...Harper's Magazine, the Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times, Forbes Magazine, etc. Thus, it is important, I believe, in the U. S. democracy that Ken Silverstein has investigated Marco Rubio.
     Ken Silverstein's mammoth investigative article about Marco Rubio featured the above graphic and first appeared in the New York Observer. American's interested in their democracy should dial-it-up online. Ken Silverstein minutely and expertly documents his article with precise names, dates, and events that predicate the career of Marco Rubio, who is falsely portrayed as a "choirboy" by much of the mainstream U. S. media. As far as I know, not a single word of Ken Silverstein's article has been challenged nor has he been sued. The title of his article...in case you would like to go online and read it...is: "MARCO RUBIO: POOR LITTLE RICH BOY RUNS INTO REAL ESTATE TROUBLE." The sub-title is: "The Senator's Three Houses, Various Lady Friends, Assorted Con Artist Pals and Piles of Unexplained Income." And the first paragraph is: "When it comes to sheer brazen corruption, chicanery and dishonesty there is one candidate who stands head and shoulders above everyone else and that is the right-wing Cuban-American and Tea Party darling Senator Marco Rubio of -- naturally -- the great state of Florida. Mr. Rubio's entire public image...is less tethered to reality than The Wizard of Oz." Yes, the graphic above, the title, the sub-title, and the first paragraph are followed by even more damning documentations of Marco Rubio's pathway to the Senate and his intended lane to the White House. And yes, the author is Ken Silverstein, one of America's best journalists. AND YES, neither the mainstream U. S. media nor Marco Rubio's highly paid army of publicists, as far as I know, have ever disputed a single word superbly documented by Ken Silverstein.  
     In sharp contrast to Marco Rubio, there is no controversy surrounding Kathy Castor. She was born in Miami but since 2007 she has brilliantly represented Tampa in the U. S. Congress. On behalf of democracy and her constituents in Florida, Kathy Castor in the 535-member United States Congress has fervently fought to bring sanity and decency to America's Cuban policy. Yet, the mainstream United States media that portrays Marco Rubio as a choirboy will never introduce the far more decent and more talented Congresswoman Kathy Castor to the American people. That is an un-democratic fact that should TODAY worry all democracy-loving Americans. 
  The moral of this story is simple: Marco Rubio appears...remember, I said "APPEARS" -- to have two fervent and dangerous goals. And they appear to be: {1} To become President of the United States and {2} to become Dictator of Cuba. Of course, if he attains the former he can also attain the latter. After all, the President of the United States is also the Commander-in-ChiefI know that concerns Ken Silverstein. I believe it should concern all democracy-loving Americans and Cuban-Americans.
*&***********************&*






      

12.12.17

After Trump's Impeachment

Then What??
{Thursday, December 14th, 2017}
     While America's embattled President, Donald Trump, appears to be staring straight ahead to stay abreast of his powerful enemies in the Democratic Party and in the Mainstream U. S. Media, I believe he would be better advised to look behind him over his right shoulder. His prime and most fatal enemies are most likely the foxes he put in his own hen-house. I have thought from the beginning, and that belief is now exacerbated, that Trump's choice as the U. S. Ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, guaranteed that he would not finish out his 4-year term as President. I also didn't think that Haley would tip her hand in his first year in the Oval Office nor in the second year, except in subtle behind-the-scenes activity...such as with constant meetings and/or contacts with Senator Marco Rubio, the other fox in Trump's hen-house.
    On Sunday, Dec. 10-2017, Ambassador Nikki Haley appeared on CBS's very high-profile Face the Nation program. Regarding her boss's decision on Jerusalem and his other controversies, Haley made sure to make the obligatory pro-Trump statements. But not-so-subtly, she purposely tightened the noose around Trump's neck when she suggested that women accusers against sexual predators should be heard, even if Trump is a target. Unlike the plethora of politicians as well as Hollywood and television sexual predators...alleged and admitted...who are currently biting the dust, Trump's denouement as President will only tangentially be related to sexual innuendos. His foreign entanglements...especially with Russia and even Israel...can be expected to end Trump's presidency in its third year. But Haley's comment on Face the Nation was intended, I truly believe, to grease the skids so even gentle pushes from behind his back by her and Rubio with send the President careening wickedly and swiftly down a precipitous and perilous slope.
  In the Republican presidential primary Nikki Haley wildly supported Marco Rubio and both of them assaulted rival Donald Trump cruelly and, true to form, he fired back.
     Apart from his ultra-vital billionaire donors, Nikki Haley, as the Governor of South Carolina, was Marco Rubio's most vociferous presidential backer because the most powerful Cuban-Americans in Miami supported Jeb Bush and the Bush dynasty.
    Throughout the 2016 presidential campaign, Marco Rubio and Nikki Haley were often side-by-side -- both in front of cameras as above and far out of public sight.
     By the time the above photo was taken, it is believed that the Nikki Haley-Marco Rubio alliance...uh, at least politically...was firm. She was willing to forsake her high-profile job as Governor of South Carolina if another job...specifically Secretary of State...would better further her own presidential ambitions. Rubio, the most ambitious presidential hopeful on the planet, reportedly gave her some early advice: She should first opt for less minefields than would befall an unprepared Secretary for State and instead aim for the UN spot on her White House pathway.
     For sure, the indelible Nikki Haley-Marco Rubio alliance was momentarily shattered but not ended when Rubio was unceremoniously wiped out in the presidential primary by Donald Trump. Haley still had her cozy job as South Carolina's governor but the bitter Rubio, after not being able to trounce Trump even in his home-state of Florida, belittled the United States Senate and indicated he would not seek a second term. But Haley and Rubio were both far more interested in the presidency than being a Governor or a Senator. So Rubio changed his mind and won a second term in the Senate, which he belittled as not being able to get anything done and he explained that was why he actually missed an alarming number of votes in the Senate. Meanwhile, the presidential primary had fueled Haley's taste for the White House. And Rubio, with second thoughts, realized a second 6-year term in the Senate was necessary to keep his presidential aspirations viable and his rich donors happy.
     And so, Nikki Haley soothed Marco Rubio's embarrassing presidential defeat and used her political astuteness to advise him that, yes, he needed the second stint in the Senate as his springboard for presidential runs in 2020 and 2024. Of course, his Vice Presidential partner would be Nikki Haley. Then by 2028 she would have her springboard to bounce right into the top White House spot after him.
      Agreeing with Marco Rubio that she wasn't ready to test the Secretary of State minefields, Nikki Haley surprised a lot of people by giving up her job as Governor of South Carolina to accept President Trump's offer to become the U. S. Ambassador to the United Nations. Of course, when Nikki Haley was sworn in, above, as UN Ambassador by Vice President Mike Pence, the person standing right beside her was Marco Rubio. By that time, they both believed that, if Trump didn't make it through his first four years as President, Rubio as Senator and Haley as UN Ambassador would have the positions and the money to be poised to test their still-festering presidential ambitions by taking over the reins of the Republican party.
     And that brings up back around to Nikki Haley's appearance this past Sunday on CBS's Face the Nation. As she did Sunday, Ms. Haley will continue to make the politically astute and obligatory defenses of her boss, President Donald Trump. But increasingly, especially if she or Marco Rubio sense that the teetering Trump is on the very edge of that precipitous and precarious cliff, she will, I believe, put the White House goals of herself and Rubio far ahead of worrying if Trump ends up at the bottom of the cliff. Her Face the Nation reference tying Trump to a mounting array of sexual accusers was subtle but quite calculated and surely not a slip of the tongue.
      The lure of being the U. S. Ambassador to the UN was not what caused Nikki Haley to quit as the Governor of South Carolina. She has strong presidential ambitions but would actually prefer being Marco Rubio's Vice President prior to her becoming Leader of the Free World. The Haley-Rubio alliance is indelible.
       As a matter of fact, President Trump has a lot of Foxes in his hen-house...not excluding Mike Pence...but by far the two most dangerous Foxes are Rubio & Haley.
      In an increasingly frayed two-party political system, especially with the Democrats so discombobulated, the montage above might well dominate America's near future -- President Marco Rubio and Vice President Nikki Haley. So, you ask, what does that have to do with Cuba or Cubaninsider? A lot, actually. It seems rather obvious to me that Rubio has two ambitions: {1} To be President of the United States; and {2} to be Dictator of Cuba. As America's Commander-in-Chief, he could conceivably be both.
     From start to finish, the money-crazed 2016 U. S. presidential election revealed to the world that America's precious Democracy was in dire trouble. The two-party system, careening downhill precipitously, produced two final candidates -- Republican Trump vs. Democrat Clinton -- that left Americans choosing between what they considered the lesser of two evils. And that's precisely how Trump shocked the world by getting elected President of the United States, which supposedly and instantly made him "the leader of the Free World." But now, after one year of the Trump presidency, it appears likely that he will be impeached, perhaps in the 3rd year of his 4-year term. SO, what then? Well, it might mean a Republican Party led by Marco Rubio and a Democratic Party led by Kirsten Gillibrand. But it's still a two-party system with new Supreme Court-approved parameters that favor politicians willing to sell-out to the highest bidders -- meaning 15 or so multi-billionaires anxious to purchase the American democracy for their very own totally undemocratic fiefdom.  
     But whoever is America's President and Commander-in-Chief starkly affects the rest of the world...including big competitors like China or Vietnam who are too powerful to push around and little nations like Cuba that are small enough to be preyed on, decade after decade, by a cancerous-like minority backed by the largest treasury in the world and by the strongest military in the world. So, in his first few months as U. S. President, Trump flew Air Force One to Communist China and to the very unified Communist Vietnam...thanks to the U. S. defeat in the Vietnam War...to suck up to mighty China and mighty Vietnam as prime U. S. trade partners. But even before sucking up to China and Vietnam, on April 16th, 2017, Trump flew to Little Havana in Miami. It was there {above} in a plush Theater named for a losing 1961 Bay of Pigs leader that Trump insulted Democracy by signing proclamations designed to appease the choir, which...after all these decades...still pines for the U. S. to overthrow the 1959 Cuban Revolution. In the shameful photo above, the clapping bald-headed man standing directly behind Trump is Florida's Governor Scott who is flanked on his right and left by two viciously one-sided Little Havana/Counter Revolutionary/Cuban-Americans in the U. S. Congress -- Mario Diaz-Balart and Marco Rubio. Mario's dad was a key Minister in the overthrown Batista Dictatorship in Cuba who in 1959 quickly became one of the richest and most powerful militants in a reconfigured South Florida. Rubio followed the well-greased Miami trend of sending only Counter Revolutionary zealots to the U. S. Congress although most Cuban-Americans even in Miami favor normal relations with Cuba. Of course, Rubio, now in his second 6-year term in the U. S. Senate, after his failed presidential bid in 2016, made it all the way to the Senate claiming his parents escaped the tyranny of Castro's Cuba when, in fact, they escaped the Batista tyranny two years before Americans began to first learn about Fidel Castro. But people like Mario and Marco don't reach the U. S. Congress from Miami by claiming any ties to Batista. And, most shameful of all, the last two generations of Americans have meekly accepted such assaults, not only on Cuba but also on the basic tenets of their frayed Democracy that has been fraying badly since 1959 when the Batista-Mafia dictatorship in Cuba reconstituted itself on U. S. soil.
        AND SO, in the closing days of 2017, which will mark the end of the first year of the Trump presidency, things are heating up with serious threats of impeachment. That salient fact means we are left with this question regarding America's two-party Democracy: Can the money-crazed system in the next presidential cycle in 2020 elect a decent President like, say, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand? The answer is: NO.
     Surely, America's democracy needs a female President but not a money-crazed dynastic one like Hillary Clinton, who merely helped the unqualified Donald Trump attain the White House. My pick would be Kirsten Gillibrand although Amy Klobuchar has long been one of the most powerful advocates for normalizing relations with Cuba. As you can see above, 9 bills proposed by Klobuchar have become laws and she currently has a decent Cuban bill under consideration. Kelly Ayotte would also be far better than any male contender from either the Democrat or Republican parties. But I believe when the U. S. Supreme Court legalized virtually unlimited money from multi-billionaires to buy-up the U. S. democracy, getting a Gillibrand or a Klobuchar or a Ayotte elected President of the United States is virtually impossible in today's money-crazed, lobbyist-mad political environs.
But:
  Now it seems that politicians like Marco Rubio, who allegedly feast on money-burgers provided by a handful of multi-billionaires, have by far the best and easiest paths to the White House whether or not they are ready or worthy. Sadly, the United States and the rest of the world long depended on America's NON-MONEY CRAZED democracy, one that didn't spawn Marco Rubios but instead stressed public servants. 
      Unquestionably, the U. S. democracy from 1776 till at least 1952 was by far the greatest form of government ever devised on this fragile planet. But in 1952...a few rogues in the Eisenhower administration got away with teaming the U. S. democracy with the Mafia to support the wicked Batista dictatorship in Cuba. Then in 1953 the same rogues began using America's might to mount coups and install U.S.-friendly dictatorships in the Caribbean and Latin America. This persisted into the 1970s when Nixon-Kissinger decided the democratically elected Salvador Allende government in Chile wanted to keep most of its resources for its own people. So a bloody U.S.-backed coup killed Allende and replaced him for the next 17 years with the murderous but U.S.-friendly Augusto Pinochet dictatorship. But even more telling of democracy's decline was January of 1959. After the Cuban Revolution rid the island of the Batista-Mafia rule, the leaders merely fled to U. S. soil. The self-serving sycophancy of the Bush dynasty, and others, helped meld the Batistiano-Mafiosi remnants into the fabric of the American democracy, and that proud democracy, as depicted above, has gradually descended into such depths as: {1} A Rubio has a better chance than a Gillibrand to be the next President of the United States, and {2} the once-proud U. S. democracy gets condemned for its ongoing Cuban policy by a 191-to-ZERO vote in the United Nations. And so, the little Uncle Sam character depicted above is now merely a faint caricature of what the Founding Fathers built.
       AND So, in the closing days of 2017, does it appear that this generation of Americans have the wherewithal, courage, and patriotism to resurrect the democracy bequeathed to them by the Founding Fathers way back in 1776? NO, I DON'T THINK SO.
     Even the Voice of America yesterday -- Dec. 11, 2017 -- hinted to its worldwide audience that the next century will likely belong to...Communist China. The VOA reported that China only recently developed a taste for wine and yet it has quickly become the world's #2 wine consumer on the way to being #1. The young Chinese lady above, working as she enjoys her wine, was probably educated at a top U. S. university...Yale, Harvard, Stanford?...but returned to a China that now is #2 in wine consumption while fast becoming #1 in the realms of the two M's -- money and military -- that the United States has long dominated internationally.
      Also this week -- the second week of December, 2017 -- Anthony Bourdain's popular CNN program "Parts Unknown" featured a decisive visit to Shanghai, the incomparable city-state on the central China coast. It has over 24 million people with the world's busiest container port. It is becoming the global financial hub. After absorbing Shanghai's incredible and burgeoning wealth, Anthony Bourdain mused wryly, "Should I become a Communist?" Hopefully not, but...?
      As he gazed across the waters at Shanghai's skyline, Anthony Bourdain asked some Chinese experts how China, as epitomized by Shanghai, has crept up so ominously on the U. S. democracy. Its startling market economy, including its tremendous trade surplus with the very cooperative United States, was one answer. Another was...unlike the United States...China has not spent decades financing or participating in foreign proxy wars. Thus China can well afford to send hundreds of thousands of students to top, eagerly awaiting universities in the U.S. and UK, universities direly seeking and reaching for all that upfront Chinese money...as U. S. college students now face a debilitating $1.3 trillion Student Loan debt designed to make the students suffer but rich bankers much richer. And the health system in Shanghai, like the education system, had learned from the U. S. emphasis on creating extreme wealth for the health industry instead of stressing healthcare for its non-rich citizens. Only the U. S. democracy, China keeps reminding its people, has educational and health policies primarily designed to enrich its already richest people. This was pointed out to Anthony Bourdain even as he marveled at how Shanghai was now "over run" with millionaires and billionaires thanks to its reconstructions of what it perceives as "democracy's weaknesses in creating but not distributing wealth."
      Also, while the U. S. infrastructure -- roads, rails, airports, etc. -- need vast infusions of cash while the U. S. is fighting trillion-dollar wars, Anthony Bourdain noted that Shanghai has ultra-modern airports and four world-class railroad stations...with trains that travel 268 miles-per-hour. Meanwhile, China -- while vastly increasing its military -- is currently spending billions of dollars building modern railroads across much of Asia and now Africa, spreading its influence even further.
    This historic photo, courtesy of Wikipedia, is used by Chinese historians today to equate China's rise to Super-stardom with America's ascendancy -- both courtesy of imperial Japan's quest in the 1930s and 1940s to dominate the world. Japan's Dec. 7-1941 attack at Pearl Harbor famously awakened America, the "Sleeping Giant" as referenced by Japan's top general, into becoming a full-bore World War II participant, just as England's Winston Churchill was praying it would become. The image above was China's Pearl Harbor. The scorched Chinese baby was one of the few survivors after Japanese war planes had bombed Shanghai on August 28th, 1937. Such atrocities turned China into a major U.S.-British ally in World War II and, of course, spawned Mao, China's most legendary Communist leader. The Shanghai that Anthony Bourdain marveled at this week on CNN is reflective of the Communist China that, unless the U. S. has another Pearl Harbor-like awakening, is ascending into what will soon become China's, not America's, century. The photo above still provides a vivid education for 1.3 billion Chinese while the education learned on Dec. 7-1941 at Pearl Harbor seems to have been forgotten by this generation of Americans. I believe that is what Anthony Bourdain learned when he featured Shanghai on his CNN Parts Unknown program this month. Shanghai today rose from the ashes that scorched the Chinese baby depicted in the historic 1937 photo. As the VOA and CNN indicated, the Chinese today are trying REAL HARD to perfect their form of Communism while Americans today are NOT EVEN TRYING to re-discover their form of Democracy.
      Thus, in December of 2017 America's President Trump is battling loud impeachment cries in the very first year of his 4-year democratically elected term while China's Dictator Zi is being hailed worldwide as "the strongest Chinese leader since Mao" and "easily the most powerful leader in the entire world."
So, what in the hell happened?
Well, lately:
Donald Trump happened...
and Marco Rubio happened...
and Nikki Haley happened...
and the American people can't seem to fix it.
*&***********************&*



  



  

10.12.17

Hypocrites Who Assault Cuba

China Is TOO BIG to Assault!!
And So Is Vietnam!!
{Monday, December 11th, 2017}
      The Chairman of Ford Motor Company, Bill Ford, this week reemphasized the U. S. hypocrisy in its decades-old attempt to destroy little Cuba while being afraid of its two old war opponents -- China and Vietnam. Both of those Communists powers are Super Trade Partners of the United States. In the 1950s China's infusion of 500,000 troops turned the Korean War into a U. S. disaster while in the 1960s North Vietnam's victory in the long, bloody Vietnam War over massive U. S. forces fused all of Vietnam under Communist rule. So, in the fading days of 2017 China is on a path to replace the U. S. as the world's #1 economic power as it also begins to challenge America's military prowess -- with massive help from U. S. companies like Ford Motor Company. This week both the Detroit Free Press and USA Today published a major article written by Phoebe Wall Howard. The article is entitled: "Ford's Designs on China Include 50 New Vehicles." It said that "Ford plans to introduce 50 new vehicles in China by 2025." The article quoted the Ford Chairman, Bill Ford, who was in Shanghai, as saying: "China is not only the largest car market in the world, it's also at the heart of electric vehicle and SUV growth and the mobility movement." With friends like Bill Ford, Communist China is poised to overtake the U. S. as the world's economic...and maybe military...Superpower, the U. S. that picks on LITTLE Cuba.
      Last month -- November, 2017 -- U. S. President Donald Trump made sure to visit and suck up to Communist China's President Zi Jinping. Zi is now considered the most powerful Chinese leader since Mao, and far too powerful to be challenged by the United States of America! After the lovely handshake above, Trump told the media, "I like him and I believe he likes me a lot." Trump, of course, hopes that is so.
       Back in November, of course, President Trump sucked up to Communist Vietnam's President Tran Dai Quang. The three Trump predecessors -- Obama, Bush, and Clinton -- had done the same thing to the Vietnamese leaders. In other words, if you can't beat them, join them...and make them a major trading partner while also encouraging American tourists and businessmen to visit both China and Vietnam.
      American tourists visiting Vietnam today flock to a major attraction -- the immense network of connecting underground tunnels that enabled Communist North Vietnam to defeat first French and then American armies supporting non-Communist South Vietnam. After the French loss, some smart Washington politicians warned warmongers that, "To beat the North Vietnamese you would have to kill them all...men, women, and children." That warning, of course, simply went unheeded.
    The warmongers in Washington -- realizing their hubris could be concealed by easily classified U. S. documents -- believed they had something the defeated French didn't have, and that was an Air Force that could bomb any nation into submission. In the 1960s Americans on television watched B-52s -- just one part of the U. S. Air Force -- drop millions of tons of bombs on North Vietnam. Also, of course, deadly chemicals were dropped to defoliate forests so the bombers could better see who and what they were bombing. But the warmongers, like the French, had miscalculated...even when 500,000 U. S. soldiers were on the ground to take advantage of history's greatest air bombardments. There were two reasons the U. S. military was humiliated in Vietnam: {1} As the French had learned, the North Vietnamese were willing to fight to the last person; and {2} the amazing underground tunnels shielded enough of their soldiers and weapons to keep fighting until, finally, the American people got tired of the casualties. The Vietnam War officially ended in 1975. Since then, the world-famed city of Saigon has been known as Ho Chi Minh City. Meanwhile, one conclusion of the Washington warmongers proved correct: classifying...hiding...their warmongering worked and to this day very little of the stupidity and hubris, which American tax-dollars pay for, has been de-classified.
Vietnamese women were vital during the War.
     The stern-faced Vietnamese female soldier above captured a South Vietnam soldier. She also took his U.S.-supplied rifle, which gave her 2 rifles and a prisoner.
2 North Vietnamese female fighters.
2 Cuban female fighters -- Haydee & Celia.
Vietnamese female captured U. S. soldier.
Vietnamese girl captured U. S. pilot.
      Both the photos and the descriptions of the do-or-die Vietnamese female guerrilla fighters are authentic but not intended to demean American soldiers, many of whom were my friends or relatives. Few of them wanted to go to that war and many who returned home alive were maimed or emotionally harmed. One of history's most famed Americans, the boxing champ Muhammad Ali, in 1967 was sentenced to five years in prison for refusing to fight in the Vietnam War. His famous quotation depicted above explained his decision, which eventually was accepted by most Americans. Ali's given birth name in Louisville, Kentucky, was Cassius Clay.
      Both before and after his 1967 stance on the Vietnam War, Clay/Ali was the Heavyweight Champion of the World and his legacy today crowns him as one of America's all-time greatest and best-known icons. Of course, classified U. S. documents still attempt to assuage the culpable reputations of many government officials who sicced the Mafia on Cuba in 1952, spawning the Cuban Revolution, and who sicced those B-52s on Vietnam in the 1960s and 1970s. In the interim, Clay/Ali's quotation has stood the test of time, eclipsing the warmongers. 
     Both Cuba and Vietnam today feature strong female representation in their governments, derivatives of lessons learned from foreign-misogynistic wars. Above a Cuban female leader signs an agreement with a Vietnamese female leader.
     In November of 2017 Vietnam began sending tons of rice to Cuba to help the island recover from recent devastating hurricanes...as the U. S. embargo continues to try to starve Cubans on the island to appease a few hard-line Cubans in the United States.
Vietnamese rice bound free-of-charge to Cuba, Nov.-2017.
  Meanwhile in Washington, Senator Marco Rubio and President Donald Trump believe now is the time, once and for all, to destroy Revolutionary Cuba. Fidel Castro died a year ago at age 90; a drought destroyed vital tobacco and cotton crops; hurricanes in 2017 destroyed thousands of Cuban homes and other properties; export prices for nickel, a key Cuban mineral, dropped precipitously; and paying off past loans from European nations drastically reduced the island's available cash. All the while the U. S. embargo from 1962 till today easily registers as the longest and cruelest embargo ever imposed by a strong nation against a weak nation. Quite aware of such a debilitating perfect storm confronting Cuba, on Nov. 9th-2017 Rubio and Trump -- not so unlike hovering Buzzards observing a dying potential meal down below -- issued 180 additional enhancements to the Embargo, obviously designed to strangle Cuba with economic sanctions opposed by the rest of the brave, free-thinking world.
      And meanwhile, while the U. S. is afraid of BIG China and Vietnam, its claws still encircle LITTLE Cuba. All the while, American citizens are supposed to be too ignorant or too afraid to be ashamed of the image depicted above, an image that condemned the United States of America by a 191-to-ZERO vote among the nations in the United Nations, including America's best but very embarrassed international friends. And of course, the mainstream United States media is too intimidated or too politically correct to mention that the original purpose of the embargo in 1962 was created to, according to de-classified U. S. documents, starve, deprive and make miserable the lives of Cubans on the island to induce them to rise up and overthrow their revolutionary government. It hasn't happened because, apparently, too many Cubans on the island remember the brutal U.S.-backed Batista-Mafia dictatorship. But...yes...since 1962 the embargo has been desperately trying to starve, deprive and make miserable the lives of Cubans on the island while, at the same time, serving the revenge, economic, and political motives of two generations of Cuban-American Counter Revolutionaries in Miami and in the U. S. Congress, like Marco Rubio.   
      Meanwhile, the updated photo above reveals the cowardice and hypocrisy that vividly contrasts an America that is afraid of BIG China & Vietnam with an America that pounds LITTLE Cuba to sate the revenge, economic, and political desires of a handful of Counter Revolutionaries, from Jorge Mas Canosa beginning in 1959 till Marco Rubio today. The young Vietnamese woman above, whose mother was probably a do-or-die guerrilla fighter against United States soldiers, is today a tourist guide in flourishing Communist Vietnam. As noted, prime tourist attractions today in Vietnam are the underground tunnels that saturated the nation and helped win the Vietnam War despite being the world's most-bombed country. The Vietnamese woman above, as a tourist guide, is showing American tourists one of those tunnels and explaining how they were camouflaged. While North Vietnam, as well as China in the Korean War, bloodied America in two historic wars, the very unified Communist Vietnam today as well as the forever united Communist China today are Super-beloved American trading partners. Meanwhile, from the 1950s till today LITTLE Cuba, which the U. S. is not afraid of, is still being unmercifully and shamefully targeted.
So...what is the difference?
      The startling triumph of Fidel Castro's Cuban Revolution in 1959 chased the U.S.-backed Batista-Mafia dictatorship to U. S. soil. First in Miami and then in Washington, thanks to the sycophancy of self-serving entities like the Bush dynasty, the Batistiano-Mafiosi leaders attained far more money and far more political power in the United States than they had ever amassed in Cuba. By the time the George H. W. Bush CIA-Vice Presidential-and-Presidential years ended, Cuban-American billionaires in Miami were the key backers of George W. Bush's two terms as President and Jeb Bush's two terms as Florida's governor...not to mention Jeb's 2016 presidential bid, etc. Now contrast all that with the fact that no overthrown Chinese or Vietnamese dictatorships ever resettled as governments-in-exile entities on U. S. soil. If you make those contrasts, I believe you will understand why today Communist China and Communist Vietnam are major United States trading partners while the United States -- SINCE 1959 -- has tried to either recapture Cuba or starve it to death.
      But despite the weird handshake above, Revolutionary Cuba has  -- after all these decades -- neither  been recaptured nor starved to death. That is truly an amazing fact, considering that two generations of the most vicious Counter Revolutionary Cubans, now epitomized by Marco Rubio, have had the backing of the Superpower U. S. government and the apathy of the propagandized U. S. citizens in their eternal quest to regain control of the pugnacious Caribbean island. In December of 2017, the question becomes: Will the four-handed handshake depicted above between Senator Rubio and President Trump FINALLY spell doom for LITTLE Revolutionary Cuba???
?????????????????
*&***********************&*

cubaninsider: "The Country That Raped Me" (A True Story)

cubaninsider: "The Country That Raped Me" (A True Story) : Note : This particular essay on  Ana Margarita Martinez  was first ...