Cuba's New Day TODAY

Monday, October 17th, 2016!!

       This Global Times image of Lady Liberty lighting up a Cuban cigar takes on added meaning today -- Oct. 17-2016. Starting today -- after a new Executive Order issued by President Obama -- there are no limits on the amount of rum and cigars that Americans can bring home from Cuba for their personal use.

      Susan Rice is the 24th U. S. National Security Advisor. Behind the scenes, she has been instrumental in advising President Obama on his monumental efforts to normalize relations with Cuba. This past weekend she was very much upfront when she addressed a Washington think tank and laid out a plethora of new presidential orders designed to further the process of normalizing relations with Cuba. Both she and the President used the same word -- "irreversible" -- in their belief that future U. S. governments will not be able to turn-back such advances, as brave and dangerous as they may be, because they will help the vast majority of Cubans, Americans, and Cuban-Americans. Ms. Rice concluded her remarks with this quip apparently meant to prick Cuban hardliners in Congress: "You can now celebrate these advances with Cuban rum and Cuban cigars." Many indeed will celebrate, but others will not. Representing the hardliners in Miami and Congress, Senator Marco Rubio, for example, railed about Obama catering to the "Castro bandits" although Susan Rice and most Americans realize that the banditry related to Cuba involves other nouns -- such as the Batistianos and the Mafiosi, just to name two.

     After months of delicate and secretive discussions, some taking place in Canada and the Vatican, President Obama announced to the world on Dec. 17-2014 that he was going to normalize relations with Cuba, the first such serious announcement since November of 1963 when President Kennedy, just prior to his ill-fated trip to Dallas, told his staff that his "priority" upon his return to Washington would be normalizing relations with Cuba. In the past two years, Obama incredibly has opened embassies in Havana and Washington for the first time since 1961; allowed commercial airplanes and cruise ships to travel to Cuba for the first time since 1962; removed Cuba from the Sponsors of Terrorism list to the utter chagrin of hardliners who relished the designation; made it easier for everyday Americans to have the freedom to travel to Cuba; and otherwise sliced deeply into the embargo of Cuba that the U. S. Congress has mandated or enhanced since 1962 when it was crafted to starve and deprive Cubans on the island to induce them to rise up and overthrow the now 90-year-old Fidel Castro. Then this past weekend President Obama backed up Susan Rice's revelations with this statement; "I approved a Presidential Policy Directive that takes another major step forward in our efforts to normalize relations with Cuba. My goal is to make our opening to Cuba irreversible." As of today, President Obama's new series of orders allows Cubans to be able to buy certain U. S. products online. Also, Cuban pharmaceutical companies can now do business in the U. S., and joint medical research by Cubans and Americans will now be permitted...among a host of other new initiatives.

     Cuba's top Minister on issues related to the United States, Josefina Vidal, very carefully studied the entire text of President Obama's new overtures to Cuba, ones he hoped would help make his "opening to Cuba irreversible." In her diplomatic mode, Ms. Vidal expressed her "approval" of the President's newly official directives toward Cuba. But beyond that tacit comment, she was -- to the surprise of some -- keenly disappointed that he did not go further in combating the Batista-Mafia "fringe elements" that, to her mind, still dictate "a Cuban policy despised by the entire world, especially those who love democracy, and a policy that shames America far more than it shames Cuba although it leaves everyday Cubans on the island to bear the brunt of the unfair punishment handed out practically unchecked by the revengeful profiteers who are allowed to gradually usurp, decade after decade, so much of the enormous prestige the U. S. had following World War II before dark elements put it in bed with dictators like Batista, Trujillo, Somoza, Pinochet. Thanks to those elements, unchecked to this day, Cuba uniquely has had to deal with the ravages of the Mafia along with the Batista regime and then the exiles. Obama has done more than any American to correct...to make amends...for that but in my eyes and the eyes of the world, he has not done enough to end the blockade's pain."  

      After minutely studying President Obama's latest directives related to Cuba, Josefina Vidal held the above news conference in Havana to air her views. She again said that she "approved" his actions and "appreciated his obvious concern for the Cuban people." She called the directives "the document" and she made it plain they didn't go far enough in regards to the embargo, which she calls a "blockade," the occupation of Guantanamo Bay, and other issues she wants discussed and resovled. Study Ms. Vidal's exact words at the news conference and you will have the clearest update on where Cuba stands during the final three months of Barack Obama's 8-year presidency: "The document does not hide the purpose of promoting changes in the potential, economic and social order of Cuba, or hide the intention to further develop interventionist programs. Both countries would benefit from civilized coexistence within the large differences between our two countries." In other words, Vidal finds it incongruous...stupid, really...that President Obama is making multiple sincere efforts to normalize relations with Cuba while Congress and other branches of government are massively funding anti-Cuban regime-change projects with pipelines of Washington-to-Miami tax dollars. At the above news conference, Vidal also made these exact statements: "The measures in the President's document are positive but very limited and generally benefit the United States more than Cuba and its people. There are aspects that maintain minimum content. U. S. exports to Cuba will not expand beyond the limited sales previously authorized and that includes key sectors of our economy. The U. S. still restricts Cuban imports in U. S. territory, especially those from the state sector, with the exception of pharmaceuticals approved in the new package of regulations." At this news conference, as she has in the past, Vidal expressed her belief that "the U. S. citizens as a whole seem not to care" about their money always being used to hurt innocent Cubans, money that could be used to help needy Americans.

      Even as President Obama, Susan Rice and many other true American democracy-lovers try to create A New Horizon for U.S.-Cuba Relations, there remains a powerful right-wing element in the U. S. bent on putting a stop to those efforts and turning back even the hint of a possible new sunrise trying so hard to emerge because of Mr. Obama's sheer boldness and decency.

          Elliott Abrams is now 68-years-old. Back in the Reagan, Bush #1 and Bush #2 presidencies he helped craft much of the anti-Cuban policy that still greatly harms, many believe, millions of innocent Cubans as well as the image of the United States. If you Google Elliott Abrams, you'll see that Wikipedia begins its bio with the reminder that "Abrams was convicted for withholding information from Congress about the Iran-Contra Affair while serving for President Ronald Reagan, but pardoned by President George H. W. Bush. During the Reagan administration, Abrams gained notoriety for his involvement in controversial foreign policy decisions regarding Nicaragua and El Salvador." His "decisions" related to Cuba were less notorious only because the Cuban narrative in the U. S. was controlled by extremists during the Reagan-Bush eras when the most extreme policies were formed. So, never elected but repeatedly appointed to powerful conservative or right-wing roles, what happens to Elliott Abrams-types when their patrons are out of office? Well, Abrams was one of the first named to presidential wannabee Ted Cruz's National Security Team. Appointee kings like Abrams also become pundits or join highly funded Think Tanks. Mr. Abrams, after quickly assessing President Obama's weekend directives related to Cuba, fired off a scathing anti-Obama article on the high-and-mighty Council on Foreign Relations website. It was posted October 16th and, in case you savor propaganda, it is entitled "The Obama Legacy in Cuba." I believe Obama's legacy in Cuba will forever tower above Abrams' legacies in Cuba, Iran, Nicaragua, El Salvador, etc. But one of his excoriations of President Obama was this sentence: "This policy is...to make up for what he sees as decades of American sin toward Cuba." Mr. Abrams, if indeed that is President Obama's motive, I believe it is an appropriate and well documented one.

        America's democracy-lovers -- such as Sarah Stephens -- are the biggest supporters of President Obama's efforts to normalize relations with Cuba. Ms. Stephens -- at the Washington-based Center for Democracy in the Americans -- is also one of America's greatest experts on U.S.-Cuban relations, as Mr. Obama knows. On October 14th she wrote: "The White House today issued something called 'Presidential Policy Directive PPD-43' devoted to 'United States-Cuban normalization.' At its core, the directive breaks, clearly and comprehensively, from the Cold War mold of U. S. policy toward Cuba, by setting forth as the New York Times described it, 'A new United States policy to lift the Cold War trade embargo and end a half century of clandestine plotting against the Cuban government.' Sarah Stephens also wrote that Obama had "unfinished" business to take care of. She specifically mentioned: "Ending the embargo with its crushing weight on Cuba; removing restrictions on U. S. travel to the island; and silencing the propaganda still broadcast by Radio-TV Marti." Sarah Stephens concluded that such things "must be completed before the promise of normalization is fully redeemed." One thing is for sure, if decent, unbiased democracy-loving Americans had their way, U.S.-Cuban relations would involve normal ingredients that benefit most Americans and most Cubans, not just a few.

       The embargo that the dysfunctional U. S. Congress wants to use to assault both Cuba and America's image for another six decades doesn't even have the support of most Cuban-Americans in Miami -- especially the youngest and best educated adults.

      Now back to the brilliant and feisty Susan Rice. She was born 51-years-ago in Washington and she has ably served President Obama as the U. S. Ambassador to the United Nations and now as America's top National Security Advisor. Here is her exact statement right after she laid out President Obama's latest directives regarding Cuba: "The United States used to have secret plans for Cuba. Now our policy is out in the open -- and online -- for everyone to read. What you see is what you get." Study those words, if you will, and judge how pertinent they are for a great democracy. You will also probably agree with Susan Rice that "secret plans for Cuba" for decades have shamed America and democracy. She and President Obama believe that, in a democracy, such plans should be "open" so the American people can judge them.

        Now judge this iconic White House photo. It shows President Obama on the left along with some of his top aides looking out the windows of Air Force One as it approached Jose Marti Airport in Havana. It was the day in 2016 when Mr. Obama became the first sitting U. S. president to visit Cuba since Calvin Coolidge arrived on a warship in 1928. Instead of as an imperialist President, Obama arrived as a friend.

     Mr. Obama had the decency to tell the Cubans, "Cuba does not need to fear a threat from the United States." Because of him, that statement will hold true...especially if Republicans finally lose their grip on Congress and don't regain the White House.

      Obama's approval rating is at 55%, amazing for a two-term President in the final three months of his often tumultuous term. His Cuban legacy, I believe, will elevate his legacy significantly in the years to come as Americans, regaining insight as they rediscover the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave, become increasingly aware of his unique brilliance and bravery regarding Cuba, an island and a topic that, as Susan Rice astutely opined, has been subjected to "secret plans" for far too long. 

In the meantime: 

      The great Brazilian artist Carlos Latuff keeps reminding the world that little Cuba since 1962 has "survived history's all-time longest and cruelest embargo ever imposed by a strong nation against a weak one." That's Latuff's little Cuban schoolgirl pounding that message atop Uncle Sam's head as she proudly skips along toting the Cuban flag and ridiculing the embargo.

&*************************&

Obama's Cuba/Congress's Cuba

An Epic, Ongoing Battle!!

       This photo -- courtesy of Skip O'Rourke/Associated Press -- reflects Obama's Cuba in historic defiance of Congress's Cuba. Southwest Airlines has just announced the start of its U.S.-to-Cuba flights. This follows JetBlue Airlines breakthrough commercial Cuban flight from Florida to Santa Clara back on August 31st. Prior to that the Congress-mandated Cuban embargo had not permitted commercial flights to Cuba in over half-a-century. Now the first Southwest Airlines commercial flight will take place on November 13th when it will depart Fort Lauderdale and land in Varadero, Cuba. On December 12th Southwest will begin commercial flights from Fort Lauderdale and Tampa to Cuba's capital, Havana. Meanwhile, of course, the Batistiano cabal in the U. S. Congress -- accustomed to dictating America's Cuban policy since shortly after the Cuban Revolution overthrew the U.S.-backed Batista dictatorship in 1959 -- is furiously trying to block the resumption of commercial flights to Cuba and all other aspects of President Obama's historically brave attempts to bring a degree of sanity and a modicum of democracy to America's Batistiano-dictated Cuban policy that the rest of the world deplores, as evidenced by the yearly 191-to-2 votes in the United Nations.

      The three Cuban-American U. S. Senators hail, not coincidentally, from America's three most notable Batistiano bastions -- Texas, New Jersey, and Miami. All three, of course, vow to block and then turn-back all of President Obama's positive overtures toward Cuba. In the dysfunctional and unpopular U. S. Congress, they can accomplish such things not only in defiance of Mr. Obama and democracy but also against the wishes of most Cuban-Americans. {Polls show that most Cuban-Americans favor Obama's and the world's democratic approach to Cuba, not Congress's}. Yet, in both branches of the U. S. Congress -- the Senate and the House of Representatives -- it appears to the entire world that moderate Cuban-Americans need not apply because, when it comes to Cuban-Americans, only self-serving hardliners can get elected to the U. S. Congress, a once sacrosanct body that polls repeatedly show most Americans now heartily disapprove of. Any study of how such grossly anti-Cuban laws as Helms-Burton, Torricelli, Wet Foot/Dry Foot, the Cuban Adjustment Act, Radio-TV Marti, etc., etc. become laws perpetually mandated by Congress would be well-worth the time of any democracy-loving American, lest they persist for another half-century.

        This graphic by the great Brazilian political cartoonist Carlos Latuff reflects an image of America's Cuban policy that Americans are not supposed to have the patriotism or intelligence to understand or the courage to oppose. On the remote chance that conclusion is true, I believe Mr. Latuff is making a statement that is both apparent and generally accepted: A handful of hardliners for over half-a-century -- with the help of the Bush dynasty, the U. S. Congress or whatever -- have dictated America's Cuban policy to suit their motives that may involve revenge, economics and/or politics. Mr. Latuff uses exactly ten words to support his most famed illustration: "THE IRONIC CURTAIN: Mr. Obama, Don't Tear Down This Wall!"

       This political cartoon makes a statement about Congress's amazing Wet Foot/Dry Foot law that provides Cuban immigrants -- and only Cuban immigrants -- special privileges beginning the moment their toes touch U. S. soil. All others, including children from sad situations, are detained and subject to deportation.

President Obama long ago tired of this image.

And democracy-lovers have tired of this one.

&*************************&

    

  

Fidel at 90: Still Inquisitive

And Still Pertinent!!

       This photo was used this week by the Jamaica Observer to illustrate an interesting article about Fidel Castro. Cuba's revolutionary icon turned 90 back on August 13th. The Observer indicated that he is still sharp of mind and keenly interested in world events, one of which is the presidential election process in the United States. A newshound and avid reader, Fidel watches news broadcasts and documentaries regularly. His devoted wife Dalia, in order to make sure he gets needed rests, often records his favorite television programs for later viewing or for special critiques. He believes, for example, that Hillary Clinton is beating Donald Trump in the U. S. presidential debates to such an extent that it has "discredited" Trump. The Observer quotes Fidel as saying, "Mr. Trump, who presents himself as having expert ability, was left discredited." The Observer is one of the very best sources for analyzing Cuba and this week's article concluded that Fidel's critique of the U. S. presidential sweepstakes "signals that Cuba's preference" is Mrs. Clinton over Mr. Trump.

      The U. S. Secretary of Defense, Ashton Carter, had an interesting comment about Cuba yesterday -- Oct. 12th, 2016. It was in Port of Spain, Trinidad, on the final day of the 12th biennial Conference of Defense Ministers, a regional event the U. S. has dominated since its inception in 1995. With Trinidad and Tobago as the host, it marked the first time it was held in a Caribbean country. This week 34 nations attended, but not Cuba. That greatly disappointed Mr. Carter. He said, "I regret it. I think they made a mistake. We are in favor of including Cuba. Cuba missed an opportunity by not being here." Cuba was noncommittal but the influential island's reasoning is simple: It is not pleased that Mr. Carter and the U. S. government is not willing to seriously discuss the return of Guantanamo Bay.

       The Russian Secretary of Defense Sergei Shoigu -- a few days before Ashton Carter's lament about Cuba yesterday -- announced that Russia was interested in having a military base in Cuba. Cuba was a notable catalyst in the Cold War between the two nuclear superpowers but it is hoped that the island will never play such a role in a future Hot War involving nuclear powers. Yet, in just the last few days the Defense Ministers of Russia and America have ominously had Cuba on their minds.

And speaking of Fidel Castro:

     This is Fidel's school document dated October 29, 1943. The second line lists his correct birthday -- August 13, 1926. When the Belen School photo was taken, Fidel was a star in four sports...especially baseball and basketball...on his way to becoming Cuba's Athlete of the Year. Confirmed by Jesuit teachers, he also had a photographic memory that was used to entertain classmates: Teachers would have him read a page from a book and then close the book and have him recite the page.

Fidel Castro, Cuba's Athlete of the Year in 1945; age 19.

&*************************& 

Russian Plans for Cuba

A Military Base??

      This is Russia's powerful Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu. When he speaks, everyone listens because he doesn't make major statements without the full concurrence of Russia's ultra-powerful President Vladimir Putin. The agonizing war in Syria has dramatically raised tensions...and near military confrontations...between the U. S. and Russia, the world's two top nuclear superpowers. Russia's two foreign military bases are in Syria. Last week Mr. Shoigu made international headlines when he mentioned that Russia is "in discussions" concerning military bases in...Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Vietnam. In regards to Cuba, Mr. Shoigu's comment provides fodder for the anti-revolutionary cabal in the U. S. that busily seeks nails to hammer shut President Obama's efforts to normalize relations with the island. Just the mention of a Russian military base in Cuba is indeed A HUGE NAIL for the anti-Cuban Miami hardliners.

      When Sergei Shoigu, Russia's 61-year-old Defense Minister, tossed out the idea of a military base in Cuba, he well knew just the mention would fuel the vicious anti-Cuban forces in Miami and Washington. That's fine with Mr. Shoigu because America's major enemies and/or competitors around the world do not want to see President Obama's normalization plans with Cuba succeed. So, whether Shoigu's inclusion of Cuba was a bluff or a threat, it gained the expected traction. The Oct. 11-2016 Miami Herald included a major article written by Franco Ordonez entitled: "Russia Considers Opening Military Base in Cuba." Ordonez wrote: "Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said Russia has come up with a list of countries where it's considering opening military bases. They include Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Vietnam. Cuban state media has cited the Russian military overtures, but the Castro administration has not offered any public indication of whether they've welcomed it." Although anti-Cuban venues such as the Miami Herald would not be likely to admit it, Cuba will not "welcome" Mr. Shoigu's overture although Revolutionary Cuba's survival since 1959 has repeatedly involved turning to other options whenever it has felt most threatened by the United States and Cuban exiles in Miami.

      The top two military powers in Russia -- President Putin and Defense Minister Shoigu -- are far more formidable foes/competitors than North Korea, Iran, or even China, another Cuba-friendly superpower that is drastically upgrading its conventional and nuclear capability. Russia's ultra-modern offensive and defensive nuclear arsenals -- and its delivery systems -- will, for the foreseeable future, remain America's biggest concern. Adding military bases in any of the four countries Shoigu mentioned -- Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela or Vietnam -- would be a game-changer. But it won't happen in Cuba -- at least not as long as Cuba can hold out hope for better U. S. relations. It won't happen in Communist Vietnam either because that prosperous nation would have too much to lose economically on the international stage. And it won't happen in Venezuela because the Cuba-friendly but teetering Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro faces far too much political opposition. 

But it could happen in Cuba-friendly Nicaragua.

      Study this photo. It was taken by Cesar Perez for the Associated Press on July 11, 2014. It shows Nicaraguan President Danny Ortega and his equally powerful wife Rosario Murillo greeting Russian President Vladimir Putin at the airport in Managua. It was a significant visit. Shortly thereafter Russia sent 50 modern tanks to Nicaragua and Russia got access to Nicaraguan airspace and ports. After you study this photo, Google Latin American history. It will tell you that, in their youth, Danny Ortega and Rosario Murillo were fierce Sandinista guerrilla fighters against powerful U.S.-backed forces -- with the Sandinistas eventually winning. Inspired by the Cuban Revolution and still idols of Fidel Castro, Ortega -- with his wife always at his side -- has been elected and re-elected President of Nicaragua. Neither Ortega nor Murillo have ever disguised their hatred or distrust of the United States. Putin knows that history and thus he probably believes Russia's best bet to have a military base in the Americas is in Nicaragua.

      This photo was taken in 1961 shortly after Fidel Castro led Cuba's successful defense at the Bay of Pigs when the Cuban exiles and the U. S. attempted to overthrow him. Fidel's heroics at the Bay of Pigs powerfully impressed Nikita Khrushchev, the dictator of the Soviet Union. It also powerfully impressed Fidel Castro who realized that the military attack as well as terrorist acts against Cuba and assassination attempts against him would never cease. The Soviet Union and the United States in 1961 were the world's only two nuclear super-powers. One was undeniably trying to kill both him and his revolutionary government and the other was offering to support him and Cuba. The Cuban narrative in the U. S. since 1961 maintains that aligning Cuba with Khrushchev and the Soviet Union was Fidel's plan all along. History refutes that assertion. In April of 1959 Fidel spent 12 days in the U. S., barely three months after the triumph of the Revolution, believing the Eisenhower administration -- instead of continuing to support the overthrown Batista-Mafia exiles -- would be Cuba's friend. Vice President Nixon famously told Fidel face-to-face that the exiles and the U. S. would regain control of Cuba within weeks. The rest is history. So are other attempts over the years, even during the Cold War, when Fidel personally tried -- for Cuba's sake -- to ease tensions with its northern superpower neighbor. During the Johnson administration, for example, Fidel personally sent LBJ a letter that pinpointed 12 capitulations Cuba was willing to make to the U. S. in exchange for "friendlier" relations. In that letter Fidel famously told President Johnson that, if it would hurt his upcoming re-election, any consideration of the proposals could be kept secret. Fidel's 12-day mission to the U. S. in April of 1959, his 12-stage proposal to President Johnson, etc., don't compute with the Batistiano-directed Cuban narrative in the U. S., so Americans -- unless they do some Googling -- wouldn't know about such things. But they indeed are historic, just as the 1961 photo above in which Fidel Castro warmly embraced Nikita Khrushchev, choosing the only nuclear superpower not trying to kill him.

      Study this photo too. That's President John Kennedy in 1962 sitting in his heavily cushioned rocking chair to ease his chronic back pain. He is talking to four ultra-powerful U. S. Generals, with Curtis LeMay closest to him. The Cuban Missile Crisis -- the closest the world has ever come to a nuclear holocaust -- in October of 1962 followed the April-1961 Bay of Pigs attack on Cuba and Fidel Castro's alignment with the Soviet Union. President Kennedy in 1960 had inherited from the pro-Batista Eisenhower-Nixon administration a bevy of covert plans to attack Cuba and to assassinate Fidel Castro, plans secretively labeled "Operation Mongoose," etc. Kennedy enthusiastically carried through on the assassination plans against Fidel and tepidly on the Bay of Pigs attack. But by 1963, gearing up for what would have been his re-election, Kennedy detested the CIA and his war-mongering Generals far more than he detested Fidel Castro. In November of 1963 Kennedy informed his top aides -- such as Pierre Salinger and Arthur Schlesinger Jr. -- that his "top priority" when he returned from his trip to Dallas was to "normalize relations with Cuba."  However, he returned to Washington from Dallas on Nov. 22-1963 in a coffin and, at least prior to the current Obama administration, no U. S. President had come close to trying "to normalize relations with Cuba" since Kennedy. Also, shortly before his ill-fated trip to Dallas, Kennedy famously bellowed, "If I could I would blow the CIA to Smithereens!!" During the Cuban Missile Crisis in October of 1962, it is abundantly clear that Kennedy felt the same way about his war-mongering Generals. Curtis LeMay, closest to Kennedy in the above photo, was among those not only advising Kennedy but beseeching him to nuke Cuba and then follow-up with an annihilating ground assault to end both the missile crisis and "the Cuban problem," an act that would likely have resulted in a massive nuclear retaliation from the Soviet Union. Several historic documentaries aired on the BBC as well as the Smithsonian and AHC networks offer chilling de-classified audio recordings of Kennedy being besieged with such advice. So, the Fidel-Khrushchev 1961 photo and the Kennedy-LeMay 1962 photo were harbingers of the never-ending U.S.-Cuban conundrum that presaged the more modern Putin-Ortega 2014 photo and the Defense Minister Shoigu October-2016 photo in which he mentioned a possible Russian military base in Cuba. In other words, what historically goes around often comes around again.

       From 1962 till 2002, the old Soviet Union and modern Russia greatly irked the U. S. with this massive Lourdes listening devise in Cuba. Both the U. S. and Russia considered it a giant spying apparatus. 

        When he visited Cuba in July of 2014, Russian President Putin reportedly discussed closer military ties with Cuban President Raul Castro but by then Raul had already had two positive but secretive phone conversations with President Obama about normalizing relations, and that superseded Putin's plans.

In an apparent effort to go over Raul's head, Putin visited Fidel.

       According to a source very close to Fidel, he told Putin, "I am still a revolutionary but now it's all about the climate, the environment and food production." It is unknown how Putin deciphered those words.

Ironically, in October of 2016 as Russia is making headlines about putting a military base on Cuban soil, the United States -- much to Cuba's chagrin -- maintains a massive military base on Cuban soil. Back in 1962 during the famed Cuban Missile Crisis, the U. S. secretively agreed to remove its nuclear missiles in Turkey aimed at the Soviet Union If the Soviets would remove their missiles in Cuba aimed at the United States. Also, the U. S. secretively agreed never to attack or invade Cuba. So, would the U. S. now secretively agree to remove its military base in Cuba if Cuba agreed never to allow Russia to have a military base in Cuba? Sorry, that superfluous question disregards Batistiano influence in Congress.

 &*************************&

Batistianos Hurt Louisiana

With Control of Congress!!

     This AP/Gerald Herbert photo shows John Bel Edwards, the Governor of Louisiana, holding a news conference at the airport in New Orleans. His plane had just touched down after a 5-day trip to Cuba that also included other top state officials, especially in the agricultural sector. Governor Edwards is desperately trying to position Louisiana in "the best possible position to expand trade with Cuba" if the U. S. government ends the embargo against Cuba. That won't happen because the U. S. government's Cuban policy is rigidly dictated by a U. S. Congress under the yoke of revengeful remnants of the Batista dictatorship that the Cuban Revolution overthrew on January 1, 1959. All these decades later, millions of Americans -- including Governor John Bel Edwards of Louisiana -- are still forced to suffer because of a grossly undemocratic Cuban policy designed to benefit a few extremists at the expense of everyone else.

      This Ismael Francesco/AP photo shows Louisiana Governor John Bel Edwards and Cuba's National Port Administrator Manuel Perez signing tentative agreements potentially important to both Louisiana and Cuba. But the operative word regarding Cuban issues, of course, is tentative. After signing a plethora of "Memorandums of Understanding" with Cuba, Governor Edwards lamented the fact that the U. S. embargo of the island, in place since 1962, will continue to stifle trade agreements that would benefit his state. Louisiana wants badly to boost rice and soybean sales to Cuba while creating shipping traffic from Louisiana ports to Cuban ports. Governor Edwards said, "We are best positioned because of our geographic proximity to the island, and because of our deep-water ports, to really ship an awful lot of goods to Cuba." 

       At cordial meetings like the one depicted above, Governor Edwards of Louisiana and his team of executives found the Cubans "very receptive and friendly." Cuba currently buys rice and soybeans from faraway Vietnam but admits that it would save "money and time" if the products and shipping came from the more convenient New Orleans ports. Louisiana, skirting around the embargo, already exports more to Cuba than any other U. S. state and prior to the embargo in 1962 was also America's largest Cuban trading partner. But Governor Edward's trip to Cuba again reveals that, decade after decade, the U. S. Cuban policy is designed to revengefully, economically and politically benefit a few while harming everyone else.

Poor Little Cuba.

A Batista-Mafia paradise 1952-1959.

A Congress-mandated Batistiano punching bag 1959-2016.

&*************************&

Cuba's Legitimate Gripes

Shame U. S. Democracy!!

And Mock U. S. Taxpayers!! 

       Cuba's Minister related to U. S. affairs, Josefina Vidal, has stunned even America's top diplomats with her skill in negotiating her David vs. Goliath points in her ongoing effort to normalize or least to improve relations between the two neighboring nations. In this month of October in the fast-fading year of 2016, Vidal is admitting that she has more to do or else she will abandon efforts to normalize U. S. relations so Cuba can concentrate on "dealing with friendly nations not under the yoke of self-serving Miami and Washington bashers of Cuba, those who have gotten rich and powerful by not just bashing the Cuban government but mostly by bashing the Cuban people." Vidal was apparently referencing Congress being able to maintain the Embargo against Cuba since 1962 and, also, she is undoubtedly aware that the leaders of more friendly nations -- China, France, Russia, Vietnam, South Korea, etc., etc. -- have recently visited Havana trying to take advantage of U. S. intransigence to gain "footholds" in Cuba because, as three of those leaders said within a two-week period, "Cuba is the pathway to closer ties in the Caribbean and Latin America." Such comments reminded Vidal that little Cuba, as the decent Obama administration draws to a close, is "not without leverage in dealing with the superpower to our north. There are other superpowers, none of whom are trying to starve Cuba. Except for the United States forever permitting a few in Miami to direct its basic Cuban policy, there is not a single nation in the whole world that can be described as anti-Cuba." 

       In October, 2016, Vidal's diplomacy is stronger than it was three years ago when she eagerly accepted the then-secretive and surprising overtures from the Obama administration to begin normalizing relations. With undeniable resolve, she immediately drew a line in the sand that many in Miami and Washington laughed at: "Remove Cuba from your State Sponsors of Terrorism list and then we'll talk." Having Cuba listed on that list was an absolute cornerstone for the Miami zealots who relished the undeserved shame it cast on Cuba and, significantly, enabled Cuban exiles to sue unrepresented Cuba in Miami courtrooms. Yet, Vidal's line in the sand moved the needle and Cuba, indeed, was taken off the onerous Sponsors of Terrorism list. Beyond that came more remarkable diplomacy that resulted in...the reopening of embassies in Havana and Washington for the first time since 1961, the resumption of cruise ships and commercial airplane traffic from the U. S. to Cuba for the first time since 1962, more Americans being allowed to visit Cuba and judge it for themselves, U. S. business relations with the island at least afforded some openings, etc., etc.

      Even while flashing her sweet, sanguine smile, Vidal this month of October has drawn another line in the sand. Like with the one regarding terrorism, she is not bluffing with her current demand, which is an end to the embargo that...quite literally...has tried to starve Cuba ever since 1962. The Miami hold on the U. S. Congress -- cemented and made indelible by the almighty alliance of the Bush dynasty with Jorge Mas Canosa back in the early 1980s -- supposedly has codified the embargo against Cuba for eternity, an abomination opposed even by most Cuban-Americans and by the entire world {the UN vote each October is 191-to-2 against it}. Yet it is abundantly clear to Vidal and to others that the hardline zealots in Miami and Washington have never been concerned about the damage to America's image and democracy's image done for decades by the U. S. Cuban policy -- the image of the vile Batista dictatorship in Cuba in the 1950s and, since 1959, by the Batistiano influence on a quite flawed and indefensible Cuban policy.

        The U. S. is not blessed with a diplomat as skilled as Vidal, but she says, "Hey! Any perceived advantage I have against the superpower is not me. My diplomatic opponents...good, smart people like Roberta Jacobson or whomever...try to defend a policy that serves just a few people...economically, politically and also the revenge motive...while they hide behind the world's richest and strongest nation. Any unbiased perspective spots a bully saying 'I can steal your lunch money because I'm strong and you're weak' or 'I can starve you into submission till you surrender totally.' Does that explain the theft of our Guantanamo Bay? Does that explain protected terrorists bombing a civilian Cuban plane loaded with children? Does that explain history's longest embargo? You tell me. I've answered your questions. Now you should answer mine." 

      Back in her purest diplomatic posture, Vidal actually started off this month of October-2016 with a Twitter Q & A session. I kid you not! She used that forum to finish drawing the line in the sand regarding the embargo, stressing that the U. S. end the embargo or Cuba -- with no options left like back in 1959 -- the island will be forced to "look elsewhere." She seems to feel that in 2016 Cuba would have more options than in 1959 when it actually had "just one," apparently meaning the Soviet Union. Vidal's most important quotation in this month's Twitter Q & A session was this exact sentence: "We have insisted once again on the need for the U. S. to end programs aimed at provoking bilateral relations." With that comment and with the above expression, Vidal is displaying frustration and surprise that the U. S. -- INCREDIBLY -- is spending millions of tax dollars each day on regime-change programs in Cuba even as it maintains the embargo and engages in efforts to normalize relations with the island. INCREDIBLE, even considering the complicity of the not-too-bright or bold taxpayers who have had six decades to muster courage to voice opinions.

     To grasp or begin to understand Vidal's staunch diplomatic stance, you need to study the above graphic. It is used courtesy of renowned Cuban expert Tracey Eaton and his Along the Malecon blog. Mr. Eaton used this graphic in regards to Vidal's Q & A session on Twitter. It references the incredible number of endless regime-change programs aimed at Cuba, specifically Mr. Eaton's new revelation concerning a propaganda effort lushly funded by unwitting taxpayers and aimed at "Cuban youth." It quickly produced a counter-effort on the island entitled: "Cuban University Students Condemn Subversive U. S. Schemes." It also rankles Vidal. Mr. Eaton also mentioned such ageless tax-sucking regime-change propaganda schemes as Radio-TV Marti, the lush and massive Miami-based operation that continues to this day although way back in the 1980s ABC News famously detailed that it was a useless "Broadcast to Nowhere" that Cuba could easily block, Cubans wouldn't believe anyway, and its apparent existence was to enrich certain Cuban-Americans in Miami. Thanks to Miami's control of Congress on Cuban issues, the Washington-to-Miami money pipeline for Radio TV-Marti still flourishes today even though neither my representative in Congress nor yours can remotely justify it...or any of the other myriad regime-change programs our tax dollars fund. Vidal says, "Expensive propaganda aimed at Cuba from the U. S. is one thing. Another thing is the expensive propaganda aimed at Americans about Cuba. And Americans pay for all that propaganda that eventually ends up hurting them perhaps more than it hurts Cubans. And are you telling me that all that regime-change money could not be better spent on worthy projects in the United States? But, uh...pardon me for asking. It's not really my place. It's actually Americans who should ask such questions." 

          As an American democracy-lover and taxpayer, I have a question: "Why does a Cuban named Josefina Vidal appear to have far more of a genuine concern for America's image and for American taxpayers than our representatives in the U. S. Congress?" In October of 2016, wouldn't the answer to that question best define America's incredible self-demeaning Cuban policy, a policy that no U. S. politician can remotely justify?

&*************************&

U.S.-Cuban Commonality

Hurricanes and Politics!!

       This REUTERS photo shows that President Obama, in the closing three months of his two-term presidency, is still trying to battle Miami hardliners and a belligerent Congress in his brave and sterling efforts to normalize relations with Cuba, the nearby island that has much in common with the United States -- including Hurricane Matthew that this week slammed ferociously into eastern Cuba and the eastern United States after devastating Haiti and much of the Caribbean. That's Jill Biden, the wife of U. S. Vice President Joe Biden, waving to well-wishers Thursday after arriving in Havana aboard Air Force Two. In the red dress on the right is Josefina Vidal, Cuba's Minister in charge of relations with the United States. Mrs. Biden was accompanied by U. S. officials specializing in educational, cultural and women's issues.

      On this week's visit to Cuba Jill Biden told Josefina Vidal, "Your country and mine are so close and our people have so much in common, even Hurricane Matthew. And there are so many people -- like me in the United States and you in Cuba -- who want so much for that closeness to not just be in physical distance but also in social, diplomatic, political and humanitarian endeavors." Vidal replied, "Your words are kind and appropriate. I am fully aware of the many Cubans and the many Americans who share your sentiments. I do."

       Generally speaking, it's neither healthy nor politically correct for the U. S. media to mention anything positive about Cuba but those restrictions don't apply to foreign journalists -- such as Sarah Marsh at the London-based REUTERS agency. Sarah's coverage of Hurricane Matthew's massive assault on eastern Cuba stressed the typically superb job the Cuban government did to protect its people and help them recover. She wrote: "Many people throughout Cuba's southeast praised the government's evacuation plans and shelters, where many remain. Authorities in convoys passed through to assess the damage. Hurricane Matthew reduced much of the Cuban town of Baracoa to rubble, whipping up giant waves that demolished cement buildings and winds that tore off roofs, but there is one thing it didn't do: take lives. Largely due to a rigorous evaluating scheme, Cuba managed to avoid the fate of neighboring Haiti, where nearly 900 deaths have been reported so far in the wake of the strongest hurricane to hit the Caribbean in nearly a decade." Ms. Marsh pointed out that the roads leading to the devastated and very historic city of Baracoa, including the La Farola highway, are "impassable" because of flooding or mudslides and a key bridge over the Toa River collapsed. The Cuban government has utilized soldiers, horses, tractors, and helicopters "to help victims" in areas where food crops, including tons of bananas, have been destroyed or severely damaged.

Sarah Marsh on Twitter wrote, "This is all that is left of this lady's home in Baracoa." 

      Sarah Marsh's Cuban coverage is fair and balanced. She is among the best for sensing the pulse of the Cuban people, especially those in the rural or remote areas. Her REUTERS articles and her Twitter page are informative and replete with photos that chronicle the joys, struggles, and rhythms of everyday Cubans.

      This Ramon Espinosa/AP photo shows a woman tearfully coming to grips with the total loss of her home in Baracoa, Cuba -- an island of wonderful people now dealing with the effects of Hurricane Matthew.

      Sarah Stephens at the Washington-based Center for Democracy in the Americas writes the informative Cuba Central update on the CDA website each Friday. Cuba, while trying to deal with its own problems related to Hurricane Matthew, as always is the first to help Haiti. Sarah Stephens on Friday wrote: "In Haiti, Cuba is already present and pitching in. Members of the Cuban Medical Brigade, some 648 Cuban doctors and other professionals, remain on site. They...offer medical care and disease-prevention efforts in the aftermath of the storm." It is widely known, as referenced by Sarah Stephens, that Cuba has provided such help to Haiti since that poorest nation in the Western Hemisphere was hit by the murderous earthquake in 2010.

      If you Google "Cuban Doctors in Haiti" the first of many articles that comes up is entitled: "Cuba Medics in Haiti Put the World to Shame." You will discover the article is by the British media, the type article the United States media would not consider. The doctor above is Cuban and his patient is Haitian. The service is free-of-charge and ubiquitous, especially in the very poorest and most dangerous areas of Haiti. 

      This Cuban doctor is providing vital vaccination care for a Haitian child as the very appreciative mother watches. The photo is courtesy of canadahaitiaction.com and that non-U.S. source is free to report on the direly needed medical expertise that Cuba provides to Haitians -- with loving care and free of charge. 

 &*************************&