6.6.13

How "Indecent" Is America's Cuban Policy?

Answer: "Very"
      The New York Times has long been America's best and most influential newspaper, and it remains so today both in print and online. Back on June 15, 1992, the New York Times published a famous and scathing editorial when it realized that the U. S. democracy was about to be shamed by yet another self-serving Cuban exile-directed congressional law, in this case the infamous "Torricelli Act." That New York Times editorial included these exact words: "This act is dubious in theory, cruel in its potential practice and ignoble in its election-year expediency. An influential faction of the Cuban-American community clamors for sticking it to a wounded regime. There is, finally, something indecent about vociferous exiles living safely in Miami prescribing more pain for their poorer cousins." {New York Times editorial; June 15, 1992}.
                 "dubious" "cruel" "ignoble" "indecent" "vociferous" "exiles" "pain"
      In the three decades prior to and in the two decades after that 1992 New York Times editorial, the seven words above aptly define America's Cuban policy as a shameful and anachronistic failure.
     And that simple, undeniable fact begs this question: Why...for over five decades...have two generations of Americans allowed their democracy to be portrayed as the quintessential bad guy {see above} when it comes to the neighboring island of Cuba? The answer has its genesis way back with America's revered Founding Fathers in the burgeoning 18th and 19th centuries.
         To comprehend America's "indecent" fetish for Cuba, one must study U. S. history. In 1823, for example, John Quincy Adams {above} was President James Monroe's Secretary of State when he advised President Monroe: "The annexation of Cuba to our federal republic will be indispensable to the continuance and integrity of the Union itself." That view permeated the United States government at the time.
John Quincy Adams in 1825 became the 6th President of the United States, expanding his fetish for Cuba.
       In fact, John Adams {above} -- the father of John Quincy Adams -- had instilled in his son's heart and the bowels of America's young democracy that it "is totally essential that these united States take hold of Cuba for our own purposes." John Adams was America's 2nd president, from 1797 till 1801, and he advised both his son John Quincy Adams and his pal Thomas Jefferson  to "take hold" of Cuba.
      The freckled-faced, sandy-haired Thomas Jefferson {above} succeeded John Adams as America's 3rd President. Famed as the author of the Declaration of Independence {from England}, Mr. Jefferson also penned infamous "Manifest Destiny" proclamations in which he maintained that the United States had the right -- manifest destiny, you know -- to annihilate the Indians to clear their western lands for occupation by white Americans for the purpose of "populating" his vast Louisiana Purchase land. Mr. Jefferson's Manifest Destiny also applied to Cuba: "Cuba is ours by location and by whatever means is necessary."
          Thomas Jefferson was President, and thus Commander in Chief, from 1801 till 1809 but he still could not do whatever was "necessary" to put Cuba in America's web because all the other imperialist powers -- especially Spain, France, Portugal, and England -- similarly coveted Cuba. John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, by the way, both died on July 4th, 1826, when the United States was still competing with other imperialist powers to own Cuba, which Columbus discovered in 1492 when he also discovered America.  
        But by July 4th, 1826 -- the day both John Adams and Thomas Jefferson died in the United States -- an Afro-Cuban woman named Mariana Grajales {above} had just turned 18-years-old in Santiago on Cuba's eastern tip. By then, Mariana craved independence for Cuba even more than the imperialist powers, including the U. S., craved conquering the island. She fought fiercely as a guerrilla against Spanish occupation and was still fighting as a soldier against Spanish armies in Cuba's first War for Independence starting in 1879. She was still fighting, as were all 13 of her children, when she died on November 23, 1893.
      The most famous of Mariana's children is Antonio Maceo Grajales, a key General in Cuba's second War for Independence against the Spanish in the 1890s. His fierce patriotism matched his mother's.
       General Antonio Maceo {portrait abovedied on the battlefield on December 7, 1896. Earlier his brothers Miguel and Jose had died in his arms while fighting the Spanish on Cuban soil. In Cuban lore, the handsome Antonio is known as "The Bronze Titan" because he personified Cuban strengthBoth General Antonio Maceo and his mother Mariana Grajales today have airports and other memorials named in their honor on the island of Cuba. They died fighting unsuccessfully for Cuban independence but they had weakened Spain's over-extended imperialist army to such an extent that America took notice and yearned for a "pretext" to declare war on Spain for the purpose of, at long last, gaining sole domination of Cuba!
         The U. S. sent a warship, the USS Maine, from Key West, Florida, to Cuba in January of 1898. Was the purpose to pick a fight with Spain? A friendly visit? Create a pretext for war? In the above photo, that is the USS Maine entering Havana Harbor on Jan. 25-1898 with the old Morro Castle Fortress on the right. 
          On Feb. 15-1898 an explosion {aboveblew the warship to bits in Havana Harbor, killing 261 sailors! It was quite a convenient catastrophe for the warmongers in the U. S. government, such as Naval officer Teddy Roosevelt, and in the U. S. media, such as newspaper moguls William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer, both of whom longed for the domination of Cuba and for Teddy Roosevelt to be President!
        But Teddy Roosevelt was still a young man in his thirties without presidential credentials although, when portrayed above in 1895, he had been named a Police Commissioner of New York City, where his friends included Hearst and Pulitzer. By 1897 Teddy was Assistant Secretary of the Navy but even Hearst and Pulitzer realized that was not a stepping-stone to the presidency. But, hey! A nice, easy little war with Hearst and Pulitzer writing the headlines and their photographers and artists providing the pictures would fill the bill perfectly! "REMEMBER THE MAINE! BLAME IT ON SPAIN!" became the ubiquitous battle-cry although everyone knew the last thing a very weak Spain wanted was a war with the U. S. in Cuba. But as Hearst and Pulitzer took care of the war fever, Colonel Teddy Roosevelt went to Texas to recruit and train a bunch of cowboys into the Rough Riders who would avenge the USS Maine! With that backdrop, America embarked on its easiest foreign war, known to history as the Spanish-American War.
This is the horse Teddy Roosevelt took with him to capture Cuba.
 So Teddy Roosevelt rode off to war in Cuba as the leader of the Rough Riders!
      The above portrait by Frederic Remington saturated U. S. newspapers and magazines depicting Teddy Roosevelt leading the charge up San Juan Hill. The very expensive Remington had been sent to Cuba by William Randolph Hearst, the powerful owner of the New York Journal, and by Hearst's friend and competitor, New York World owner Joseph Pulitzer, to paint heroic images of Teddy Roosevelt's capture of Cuba. However, when he first got to the island Remington wired this message back to New York: "There's no war to paint so I'm coming home." But Hearst famously wired back: "Stay in Cuba. You provide the pictures and I'll provide the war." So, Remington stayed and Hearst provided the war. The gullible American people accepted such lies as depicted by the famed painter and the newspaper moguls who wanted Teddy Roosevelt to be President of the world's imperialist power, imperialism that would start with CUBA!
So, Teddy Roosevelt led that famous "charge" up San Juan Hill!
     Of course, San Juan Hill was no more than an ant hill as far as Spanish resistance was concerned. But after Hearst, Pulitzer, Remington, and the rest of Roosevelt's friends in the publishing world had finished with their uncontested lies, Americans believed that Teddy Roosevelt and his Rough Riders had won a justified and monumental war for the United States. Justified it wasn't but monumental it definitely was!
           The Treaty of Paris...that's John Hay signing for the United States...concluded the Spanish-American War, which ended Spain's rule of Cuba and gave it to the U. S. No Cuban, of course, was allowed to be present at the treaty signing. But the expansionists who controlled the U. S. government said, "HEY! Cuba is fine but let's don't stop there!" So, the U. S., via the Spanish-American War, took other very valuable Spanish colonies -- Puerto Rico, Hawaii, Guam, Wake Island, the Marianas, and the Philippines! Spain's long reign as an imperialist power was over! America's had just begun, altering the world order forever! 
         The above photo shows the heroic "1st Kentucky Volunteers" taking charge of Puerto Rico as one of the many U. S. prizes derived from the Spanish-American War that originally was intended to only capture Cuba from Spain. Puerto Rico, unfortunately, was merely one of the aforementioned after-thoughts!
        Till the end of his life {he died in Beverly Hills, CA, on Aug.14-1951}, the newspaper mogul William Randolph Hearst called the Spanish-American War his own "splendid little war." And, of course, it was.
         On the eve of the Spanish-American War rival newspapers ran cartoons like the one above to mock the more powerful newspaper tycoons William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer for so obviously championing a war to capture Cuba from Spain. That's Hearst depicted above on the right and Pulitzer on the left supposedly jostling to see which one would get the most credit for starting a war they both knew would be easily won. You might note that Hearst is telling Pulitzer, "This is my war. I bought and paid for it and if you don't stop bothering me..." History indeed gives Hearst the most credit for buying and paying for the start of the war but, of course, the U. S. government paid for the rest and many duped men also paid for it with their blood. Rich men often start wars and reap the rewards but poor people actually fight wars. 
       While keeping posted on his "splendid little war" and making sure his vast newspaper and magazine empire saturated America with its slanted and make-believe coverage, William Randolph Hearst leisurely and confidently played croquet on one of his favorite estates, as reported in America by Life Magazine.
         The Hearst Castle in California has always been William Randolph Hearst's most famous estate, befitting a man who could get the U. S. government to fight his own little war. Of course, the 261 sailors who died on the USS Maine and all the other victims of the "splendid little war" probably deserved better.
       And...oh, yes...the "splendid little war" fulfilled both of William Randolph Hearst's prime desires -- capturing Cuba and putting his own man in Washington as President! The Spanish-American War elevated Teddy Roosevelt {aboveinto the White House as the President of the United States from 1901 till 1909. He became, at age 42, the youngest President, one year younger than John Kennedy was in 1960.
       Not surprisingly, many of the people who did not directly benefit from William Randolph Hearst's "splendid little war" expressed shame and outrage that the United States would do such a thing as fabricate the Spanish-American War for the purpose of stealing colonial land from Spain, which at the time was in no position to fight back. For example, the Philadelphia Press, which was not one of the Hearst newspapers, featured the above cartoon showing the U. S. eagle, or buzzard, spreading its wings over 10,000 miles of captured territory -- from Cuba and Puerto Rico in the Caribbean to a cluster of island nations in the Pacific Ocean. But the obscenely greedy William Randolph Hearst, and men like him, did, in fact, use the Spanish-American War to make the United States a true world power for the first time. And, yes, the two main imprimaturs of men like Mr. Hearst -- self-indulgence and greed -- are etched like precarious plateaus into the soul of the U. S. democracy, with the island of Cuba its shining example.
Thus, from 1898 until 1959 the U. S. alone dominated Cuba.
    The Cuban Revolution's victory over the U.S.-backed Batista-Mafia dictatorship in January of 1959 ended the U. S. domination of the island. And in the decades to come the astounding victory over Batista in Cuba encouraged other nations in the Caribbean and Latin America to try to overthrow other U. S. - backed dictators. No other revolution matched Cuba's success but it produced movements that, by the 1970s and 1980s, were eliminating the most ruthless U.S.-friendly dictators -- such as Trujillo, Pinochet, Somoza, Videla, etc. -- with democratic elections. In June of 2013 three Latin American nations are holding trials of former dictators that American leaders Nixon-Reagan-Bush-Kissinger thought were wonderful chaps. Even more astounding, the combined might of the United States, the world superpower; the Mafia, the world's most renowned criminal organization; and the furiously revengeful and powerful Cuban exiles has amazingly been unable to overthrow Revolutionary Cuba in all the years since 1959! And you know what? Mariana Grajales...remember her?...remains a major reason for the Cuban Revolution's triumph and longevity!
         Mariana Grajales is the legendary Cuban woman who lived from 1808 until 1893. All her life, beginning when she was a teenage girl in Santiago de Cuba, she fought for Cuban independence. After her death, her three famous sons -- Antonio, Miguel, and Jose Maceo -- died fighting for the same thing. So, Spain's dominion over Cuba out-lived Mariana Grajales and all of her children. But their sacrifices had weakened Spain, which in 1898 was in no position to resist America's long-standing desire to control Cuba. But when America's dominance of Cuba was ended by the Cuban Revolution in 1959, Mariana Grajales was a prime factor because an audacious young lawyer from eastern Cuba idolized her fighting spirit!
       In the 1950s rebel leader Fidel Castro did not have nearly enough resources to threaten the Mafia and certainly had zero chances of defeating a modern U.S.-supplied-and-trained Batista army. THAT IS...until he recognized that half the island's population -- THE FEMALE HALF -- hated the Batista-Mafia dictatorship with a do-or-die passion, reminding Fidel of Mariana Grajales! Thus, Fidel Castro's revolutionary fame is based on that insight or stratagem! Beginning in 1953 Fidel Castro based his revolutionary life on fiercely motivated and awesomely capable women such as Celia Sanchez, Haydee Santamaria, Melba Hernandez, Vilma Espin, and...THE LATE MARIANA GRAJALES, who was Fidel's all-time favorite Cuban patriot.
     The Fidel Castro-named Mariana Grajales Women's Platoon, led by Tete Puebla, emerged as a legendary fighting unit in the Sierra Maestra Mountains of eastern Cuba in 1956 and earned a reputation as the fieriest and bravest anti-Batista warriors until the end of the war that beat the "unbeatable" Batista.
      At the above testimonial for General Tete Puebla, the unwell Fidel Castro reached across the table to shake her hand. Moments before, while standing before the microphone, he said, "Without Tete Puebla and the Mariana Grajales Women's Platoon, we would not have won the Revolutionary War. You have heard facts, exaggerations, and lies about the revolution. Tete Puebla and her platoon represent facts."
Tete Puebla is still a General in the Cuban army.
General Tete Puebla adores Cuba's children.
    Tete Puebla was a teenager when she led the Mariana Grajales Platoon in some of the deadliest fighting during the Revolutionary War. Her inspiration is as vivid today as it was then: Batista's enforcers, the infamous Masferrer Tigers, had come to her village and burned some of her friends alive in gas-soaked sheds and gunny sacks. After the rebel victory at Santa Clara in the last days of December in 1958, Tete hoped Fulgencio Batista and Rolando Masferrer would stand and fight in Havana. They didn't. Batista's getaway airplane, which included the last actual gold from the Cuban treasury, took him to Dictator Trujillo's Dominican Republic and Masferrer's getaway boat, which included $10 million in U.S. cash, took him to the safe haven of Miami.
         Rolando Masferrer was a rich and powerful leader in South Florida. {"en el pais de los mitos" means "in the country of myths"} In Miami Masferrer founded two of the first paramilitary and terrorist units -- 30th of November and Alpah 66 -- that fiercely tried to assassinate Fidel Castro and overthrow the Cuban Revolution. Masferrer was among a trio of powerful Cuban exiles with aspirations of returning to Cuba as the island's leader. But an internecine bomb killed Masferrer on Oct. 31-1975 when he turned the ignition in his car outside his home in Miami, which had become the bomb/terrorist capital of the world.
        The U. S. government supported Rolando Masferrer's vicious activities first in Batista's Cuba and then as an exile in Miami. Does that mean Rolando Masferrer was a more "decent" person than, say, Tete Puebla? In 2013 that's still a politically incorrect question. But it's also a pertinent and relevant question!
       General Puebla in June of 2013 remains on active duty in Cuba in hopes of preserving the Cuban Revolution from imperialist powers or foreign-backed Batista/Masferrer-type leaders. That's why references to Rolando Masferrer and Mariana Grajales in June-2013 are relevant and pertinent. If it were not for the patriotic Mariana and the fiendish Masferrer there would not have been a General Puebla.
     Cuban women like General Puebla and her friend Nidia Sarabia, as well as their views, are supposed to remain unknown to Americans and the U. S. media. But other prime sources know who they are and what they think. The BBC used the above photo to illustrate a documentary about Celia Sanchez. Nidia talked about helping Celia keep meticulous revolutionary records; Tete talked about fighting at age 15 alongside Celia in the Sierra Maestra. The history of Cuban women like Mariana, Celia, Haydee, and Vilma as well as the memories of Cuban women like the still-living Tete Puebla, Nidia Sarabia, Melba Hernandez, and Marta Rojas are fascinating and important in the Cuban-U. S. conundrum. To mandate or pretend that they never existed or don't exist or that their opinions don't count shames the U. S. democracy...and helps explain why the New York Times correctly defined the American Cuban policy with those seven accurate words:
"Indecent" "Ignoble" "Cruel" "Dubious" "Vociferous" "Exiles" "Pain"
************************




27.5.13

The Batistianos vs. Democracy-lovers!

Why Are the Batistianos Winning?
{Updated: Thursday, May 30th, 2013}
      Judy Chu {above} is a member of the U. S. Congress. Born in Los Angeles 59 years ago {July 7, 1953}, Representative Chu was elected to Congress in 2009 from California's San Gabriel Valley. She is a brilliant and exceedingly decent woman who has a profound and abiding love for America and for democracy.
     As a majestic lover of democracy, Judy Chu in the U.S. Congress fights doggedly for her constituents, the people of San Gabriel Valley, and for all American citizens
   This past week Congresswoman Judy Chu visited Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, site of the U. S. Naval Base that sits on 45 square miles of plush Cuban land that the U. S. stole from Cuba back in 1903 shortly after the Spanish-American War, which established the U. S. as the imperial masters of the island, at least until the overthrow of the U.S.-backed Batista-Mafia dictatorship in 1959. Rep. Chu was starkly embarrassed and ashamed at what she saw at Guantanamo Bay in May of 2013. With teary eyes upon her return to the U. S., she issued this statement: "We must close this detention center. Ultimately, this is more than a policy concern. It's a moral one. This nation is synonymous with justice and the rule of law. Our government must live up to the ideals that the American people abide by each and every day. And that starts by closing Guantanamo." Simple, profound, truthful words that should be heeded.
        Of course, what shamed and embarrassed Congresswoman Judy Chu the most on her visit to Guantanamo Bay was the U. S. military prison, euphemistically called "a detention center" by the U. S. government but known worldwide as a brutal prison, one that Amnesty International calls, "The gulag of our time." Not closing the prison, and not returning Guantanamo Bay to its rightful owner, Cuba, makes the U. S. resemble -- in the eyes of America's Caribbean and Latin American neighbors as well as its best friends around the world -- an anti-democratic bully and pariah. In previous eras, the U. S. cast a different image.
      For over a decade, the infamous U. S. prison at Guantanamo Bay has spouted international headlines about the depraved treatment...including torture...of prisoners, some of whom have been held for over a decade without ever being charged or given a trial. The prisoners have included a Canadian citizen that Canada believes is totally innocent and a young man who was captured when he was in his young teens and claims he has never had a terrorist or anti-American thought in his life, at least till he was scooped off a street and shipped to Gitmo. America's image and its treasury both need to recover from Gitmo.
        An Australian named David Hicks claimed he was totally innocent but ended up being one of the tortured prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. Later, after the Australian government intervened, Hicks was flown back to Australia, totally free and presumably enriched with a lot of U. S. tax dollars courtesy of Gitmo.
     The New York Times recently published a long, heart-wrenching article entitled "Gitmo Is Killing Me" that was actually penned by prisoner Samir Naji al Hasan Moqbel. The article flashed around the world.
   Democracy lovers were shamed to learn that the waterboarding/police dog-loving Bush administration, which funneled billions of tax dollars to refurbish Gitmo and hire dozens of politically connected security firms and construction companies, also flew many prisoners to other countries, including dictatorships, so they could be tortured-interrogated away from U. S. bases or soil. Photos such as the one above circled around the globe, embarrassing and shaming democracy lovers, especially those who were told that the photos represented a routine policy of the United States, which they  once so mightily admired because of its cherished democracy ideals. Who is proud of a Gitmo dog threatening a helpless prisoner?
       The UPI News Agency last week used the above photo to graphically tell the world how painfully the hunger-striking prisoners at Gitmo are being force-fed. Over 100 of the 166 prisoners at Gitmo were/are being kept alive by tubes running up their noses and down into their stomachs. Democracy lovers this week were also informed by the mainstream U. S. media -- CNN, the New York Times, USA Today -- that it costs hard-pressed U. S. taxpayers $1 million a year {correct} to incarcerate each Gitmo prisoner while, if they were transferred to a maximum security federal prison in the U. S., it would cost only $25,000 per prisoner per year {correct}. Is Gitmo okay because the U. S. has it on Cuban soil?
         Could the billions of tax dollars being spent at the U.S.-occupied Guantanamo Naval Base on land that rightfully belongs to Cuba be better spent on, say, fighting child hunger in America and then helping those children secure decent educations...even if the U. S. has to divert some of the billions being poured into Guantanamo Bay into more decent and worthwhile projects on U. S. soil?
        Last week a vital bridge in the state of Washington simply collapsed, dropping vehicles into an unforgiving river. Americans are told that the U. S. does not have the money to adequately begin refurbishing what is known to be a vastly decaying infrastructure. But since 1959 Americans have also been told to cough up billions and billions of dollars to re-capture Cuba, to enforce the U. S. embargo of Cuba as well as a wide litany of other Batistiano-inspired anti-Cuban dictates, to send pipelines of tax money to anti-Cuban propaganda outlets such as Radio-TV Marti in Miami, to make Guantanamo Bay a plush U. S. base on ill-gotten Cuban land, to create and operate a prison aT Guantanamo Bay that besmirches the image of the U. S. democracy, etc., etc. Is it time Americans asked if some of those billions of dollars could be diverted to other more decent and badly needed projects? LIKE, for example, THAT BRIDGE!
       On the second day of his first four-year term as President of the United States, Barack Obama famously reminded the American people "I will close Gitmo," as he had promised he would do during his historic presidential campaign. More than five years later Gitmo is still open and still sucking U. S. oxygen.
         Once again last week, now deep into his second four-year term as President, Barack Obama explained to the American people how vital it is to "close Gitmo" to begin to restore at least some of the damage it has done to the United States and its image as the bastion of democracy.
        But a very sad President Obama knows that he is not strong enough to close Gitmo or to do other sane, sensible Cuban-related things that the vast majority of Americans and the vast majority of people around the world want him to do. He is a smart, decent man. He is President and Commander in Chief of the United States, the strongest nation by far in the history of the world. He is the Leader of the Free World. Yet, he is not strong enough or free enough to do sane, sensible Cuban-related things that the majority of people in the United States and the world would like for him to do. His sadness is America's sadness.
President Obama is aware this is the image the world has of the U. S. - Cuban policy.
       President Obama is aware that a few anti-Castro Cubans in Washington dictate America's Cuban policy as a Government-{or Dictatorship}-in-Exile. Yes, that is the first such abomination for the U. S. democracy. 
      Moreover, President Obama is aware that his precious legacy as a two-term, black President will forever be tarnished by the above graphic, which correctly depicts him as the ashamed, embarrassed, and unwilling defender of America's Cuban policy. "How has this happened in the strongest nation and the best democracy in the world?" That, I believe, is a question you should ask and, more importantly, you should keep asking it until you are satisfied with the answer. I asked it and, after diligent research, came up with an answer that takes me back to Judy Chu,  a valued member of the U. S. Congress from California.
         Judy Chu is an anomaly and not just because she is one of the 535 members of the U. S. Congress -- 100 Senators and 435 Representatives. She is a rare bird in that she is a member of the U. S. Congress who has not been bought-and-paid for by special interests, such as the rich and powerful Cuban-exile lobby also known as the Batistianos. Thus, as a decent democracy-loving Congresswoman, Judy Chu can visit Guantanamo Bay in Cuba and then, in tears, express how ashamed she is about America's Cuban policy.
 And consider Kathy Castor...please!
       Kathy Castor is also an anomaly, a rare bird. She is a member of the U. S. Congress and she is neither bought-and-paid-for nor is she intimidated by the Cuban-exile zealots who have dominated her area since 1959, seven years BEFORE SHE WAS BORN. Kathy Castor was born in Miami 46 years ago, on August 20th, 1966. Since 2007 she has represented the 14th District of Florida in the U. S. Congress. Her District includes Tampa! The three Mafia kingpins that ruled Cuba in the 1950s -- Fulgencio Batista, Meyer Lansky, and Santo Trafficante Jr. -- all owned homes and/or businesses in the Tampa area both BEFORE AND AFTER their lucrative dictatorship in Cuba. A couple of generations later, rich and powerful remnants of that overthrown dictatorship in Cuba remain ultra-powerful factors in the Tampa area. Yet, Kathy Castor has forged a political career that REPRESENTS THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE MAJORITY OF HER CONSTITUENTS IN THE 14TH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA AND THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!
    Kathy Castor recently returned to Tampa from a visit to Cuba where she bravely and righteously continued her passionate quest to improve U.S.-Cuban relations BECAUSE SHE WELL KNOWS IT WOULD IMPROVE THE LIVES OF THE MAJORITY OF CUBAN-AMERICANS, THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS, AND THE MAJORITY OF THE WELL-DESERVING BUT MUCH-MALIGNED EVERYDAY CUBANS ON THE ISLAND. As a businesswoman and since 2007 as a member of the U. S. Congress from Tampa, Kathy Castor has long advocated sane, decent relations with Cuba...brilliantly pointing out how unrestricted tourism to Cuba and normal business relations with Cuba would vastly benefit the city of Tampa, the state of Florida, the United States, Cuba, the Caribbean, Latin America, and the world. But powerful Cuban exiles disagree with her.
       And sadly, the U. S. Congress does not have enough anomalies to go along with Florida's Kathy Castor and California's Judy Chu. That's why the approval rating of the U. S. Congress is in the single digits, 7% according to one recent poll; and that's undoubtedly the 7% that have bought-and-paid-for it's majority decisions, most of which, of course, are contrary to the sane, decent views regarding Cuba, Guantanamo Bay, and Gitmo as represented by Congresswomen Castor and Chu. Is the Batistiano-maligned U. S. democracy strong enough to remove the obviously incompetent and/or bought-and-paid-for members of a U. S. Congress that has a single-digit approval rating? Apparently not. Incompetent money-hungry politicos who are not unveiled as serial killers are basically entrenched because, by selling out to special interests, they have too much money for less endowed candidates to compete. Thus, most Americans now realize that decent, public-minded candidates no longer enter the political arena...with only a few glaring exceptions.
      In 2011 the U. S. Supreme Court surprised, blind-sided, and dismayed democracy-lovers like me when it essentially ruled that anyone or anything, individuals or corporations, could use vast amounts of known and unknown money in political campaigns, further distorting the democracy process.
          Karl Rove-type political fund-raisers rejoiced over that U. S. Supreme Court decision, but not democracy-lovers. And Karl Rove, you might remember, already had enough audacity and money to make George W. Bush a two-term governor of Texas and then a two-term President of the United States. Oh, my!
 The Founding Fathers bequeathed to the American people the greatest government in world history.
For over 200 years the United States democracy prevailed.
      But in the 1930s a military dictator in Cuba, Fulgencio Batista {above}, secured military and economic support from the U. S. by allowing American businesses to partake in the rape and robbery of the island. By the early 1940s Batista and his cronies had stolen millions of dollars from Cuba's resources and American taxpayers. So Batista retired to his mansions in South Florida where his best friend was Meyer Lansky!
     Meyer Lansky, the Jewish Mafia kingpin, mentioned to the retired Batista, "I've always wanted the Mob to own its own country." And so...Batista obliged. He returned to Cuba in 1952, along with his buddy Lansky, and easily formed the 2nd Batista dictatorship. Batista and Lansky were smart enough to again secure the support of the U. S. by allowing U. S. businesses to also partake in the rape and robbery of Cuba.
Batista's 2nd Cuban dictatorship began in 1952 as a favor to his friend, mobster Meyer Lansky.
     During the 1950s the mainstream U. S. media regularly informed the American people of the piggy-bank Cuba was for the Batistianos, the Mafia, and U. S. corporations. As the Mafia kingpin in Cuba, Lansky was in charge of gambling, prostitution, and illegal drugs. Life Magazine used the above photo to show Meyer Lansky and a female companion leaving one of his casino-hotels in Havana, reportedly with about $200,000.00 in the satchel -- one night's loot from just one of his eleven top casino-hotels on the island.
     In 1952 newspapers told the American people about the Batista-Mafia takeover of Cuba...with the "blessing" of the governments in Havana and Washington.
         By 1958, the year before the triumph of the Cuban Revolution, everyone was aware that the Batista-Mafia dictatorship in Cuba {above} was powered by a U. S.-provided military courtesy of the U. S. taxpayers.
In 1958 Cuban dictator Batista was a welcome guest {see abovein President Eisenhower's White House. 
After fleeing the Cuban Revolution, Meyer Lansky resumed his long, safe life in Miami.
In the 1950s tourists, especially sinners with a lot of money, were beckoned to Cuba!
     But the Batista-Mafia dictatorship in Cuba in the 1950s made a big mistake: Routinely murdering Cuban children as a warning to their parents not to resist the dictatorship. The above march was led by the brave mother of 15-year-old Willie Soler, whose tortured body and those of his three classmates were left in an abandoned warehouse. Such murders aroused the female half of the Cuban population into a feverish do-or-die anti-Batista pitch. A young lawyer wisely took full advantage of the feminine hatred of Batista. Thus Fidel Castro became the first revolutionary to tap into the previously untapped and unending resources of an outraged female population, fully half of the island's then six million people.
     Celia Sanchez was an angelic doctor's daughter in eastern Cuba till she blamed the Batistianos for the murder of a beloved little peasant girl named Maria Ochoa. That transformed Celia into the greatest female guerrilla fighter and revolutionary leader in the history of the world. Maria, or at least Celia's belief about what happened to her, became the biggest mistake the Batistianos ever made on the island of Cuba.
       To this day Celia Sanchez epitomizes the triumph of the Cuban Revolution as well as its longevity.
       Thus the Cuban Revolution in January of 1959 shocked the world by overthrowing the Batista dictatorship although Batista was supported by the Mafia, the strongest criminal organization in the world, and by the United States, the strongest nation in the world. But that's not why the Cuban Revolution says a lot more about the United States, the world superpower, than it says about Cuba, an island.
          In Revolutionary Cuba in 1959 Celia Sanchez, as the top decision-maker on the island with Fidel Castro's full blessing, laid down a proclamation: "The Batistianos will never regain control of Cuba as long as I live or as long as Fidel lives." She died of cancer on Jan. 11-1980 but in May of 2013 Fidel Castro at age 86 is still alive. And thus Celia's proclamation remains alive...and she remains the prime reason that is so.
         But even Celia Sanchez was surprised that the Batista-Lansky dictatorship in Cuba, after fleeing the Cuban Revolution, simply reconstituted itself in South Florida, where presumably much of their loot had already been sent and where, for sure, their getaway ships and boats had been aimed...just in case those rebels in the Sierra Maestra Mountains of eastern Cuba fought their way close to Havana, which they did on Dec.28-1958 when they captured the city of Santa Clara. The U. S. teaming with the Mafia to support the Batista dictatorship in Cuba had surprised many democracy-lovers. The U. S. acceptance of the reconstituted Batista dictatorship on U. S. soil has surprised all democracy-lovers. But still, apparently because of lingering memories of the Batista-Lansky atrocities, the Cuban Revolution has managed -- against all odds -- to maintain control of Cuba from January of 1959 until today...and counting!
         Like most of the top Batistianos, Meyer Lansky died of old age as a Mafia kingpin who never had to worry about U. S. authorities. He never spent a day or night in a U. S. jail. The FBI estimated that by the time Lansky returned to Florida from Cuba he was worth at least 300 million dollars in 1950s dollars. Americans to this day are not supposed to wonder..."Uh, why did men like Lansky and Batista hate Castro so much while they were always quite fond of the U. S. government?" The answer is either "They loved democracy!" or "They loved ill-gotten money!" I leave it to you to decide the correct answer. And while you are researching or pondering that answer, ask yourself why you know so much about Fidel Castro and so little about Celia Sanchez. Is it because it is hard to vilify the child-loving doctor's daughter while, with the Cuban exiles essentially dictating the history of the Cuban Revolution, it has been easy to vilify the macho Fidel Castro? Uh, just asking...and hoping you'll research the topic yourself instead of being told what to think about it.  
        All of which brings me back around to a lament about a weakness of the U. S. democracy: It consists of just two parties -- the Democrats {a bucking mule} and the Republicans {a bellowing elephant}. It worked wonderfully for a long time, when both the mule and the elephant -- or at least one of the two -- were democracy-lovers. But in 2013, as personified by a U. S. Congress with a 7% approval rating, both the mule and the elephant have been bought-and-paid-for by rich and powerful special interests. SO MUCH FOR DEMOCRACY BUT IT SURE WAS SOMETHING TO BEHOLD FOR ABOUT 240 YEARS, wasn't it? 
      Thus the American schoolgirl who defined Democracy as "The freedom to elect our own dictators" apparently has done some diligent research, perhaps by just googling names like "Batista" and "Lansky" or topics such as "The Cuban Revolution." WOULD THOMAS JEFFERSON HAVE LIKED HER ANSWER?
      What are the chances of Uncle Sam ever regaining his statue and pride?
Not good, unless............
    .......someone like Kathy Castor of Tampa is elected President of the United States for two terms and, unlike President Obama, is accorded the power to circumvent a mostly bought-and-paid-for U. S. Congress when it comes to such insane, undemocratic items as the Batistiano-directed U. S. Cuban policy. Even while representing the U. S. democracy from the city of Tampa, Florida, U. S. Congresswoman Kathy Castor has both the guts and the integrity to defy anti-democracy/anti-Cuban insanity that, since 1959, has been designed to enrich and empower a revengeful handful of Cuban exiles and their sycophants. Kathy Castor, an anomaly in the U. S. Congress, could also be a rare bird in the White House! 
And so could......
...Judy Chu, the U. S. congresswoman from California.
     When a handful of Cuban-Americans in the U. S. Congress can dictate America's Cuban policy to the detriment of most Cubans, most Americans, most Caribbeans, most Latin Americans and most citizens of the world, then something is wrong with the U. S. democracy. Congresswomen Kathy Castor and Judy Chu have eloquently enunciated those wrongs after recently returning from the island of Cuba. But that's why Kathy Castor and Judy Chu are anomalies, rare birds. And that's why I believe the Cuban Revolution says a lot more about the U. S. than it says about Cuba.
By the way.............
         The REUTERS NEWS AGENCY this week had a major article on a racing pigeon named "Bolt." At an auction in Brussels, a Belgian man sold Bolt to a Chinese man for $398,500. Buyers from 27 countries attended the auction. Nine of the ten highest priced pigeons were bought by Chinese or Taiwanese buyers. Bolt's new owner stressed that his prized bird has about eight more prime breeding years.
*****************
  





cubaninsider: "The Country That Raped Me" (A True Story)

cubaninsider: "The Country That Raped Me" (A True Story) : Note : This particular essay on  Ana Margarita Martinez  was first ...